TRND vs. SCHK

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TRND (Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - TRND tracks the Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index while SCHK tracks the Schwab 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRND returned 5.64%/yr vs 12.32%/yr for SCHK. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRND charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.

Performance

TRND vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRND achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly lower than SCHK's 10.72% return.

TRND

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -0.72%
• 6M: 5.80%
• YTD: 8.53%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 9.94%
• 5Y*: 5.64%
• 10Y*: —

SCHK

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 1.22%
• 6M: 8.38%
• YTD: 10.72%
• 1Y: 21.33%
• 3Y*: 19.96%
• 5Y*: 12.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRND vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF	8.53%	6.03%	11.97%	16.48%	-15.37%	12.95%	4.73%	8.58%
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF	10.72%	17.23%	24.48%	26.63%	-19.51%	26.17%	20.75%	10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between TRND and SCHK is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019	0.90

The correlation between TRND and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

TRND vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TRND	SCHK
Technology	34.1%	38.0%
Industrials	12.8%	8.9%
Financial Services	12.4%	11.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	9.8%
Communication Services	7.5%	10.1%
Healthcare	7.2%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.3%
Energy	3.4%	3.2%
Basic Materials	3.3%	1.9%
Real Estate	2.5%	2.0%
Utilities	2.1%	2.1%

Return for Risk

TRND vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRND

TRND Risk / Return Rank: 53
TRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
TRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
TRND Omega Ratio Rank: 50
TRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
TRND Martin Ratio Rank: 61

SCHK

SCHK Risk / Return Rank: 64
SCHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
SCHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
SCHK Omega Ratio Rank: 63
SCHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SCHK Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRND vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRND	SCHK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.67	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	2.31	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.30	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	2.39	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.65	10.43	-1.79

TRND vs. SCHK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRND Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the SCHK Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRND and SCHK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TRND vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRND drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRND and SCHK.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRND	SCHK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.88%	-34.80%	+16.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.00%	-8.97%	+0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.56%	-19.21%	+9.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.21%	-25.44%	+9.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.95%	-1.02%	-0.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.16%	-5.14%	-0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	2.05%	-0.08%

Volatility

TRND vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) at 4.07%. This indicates that TRND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRND	SCHK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	4.07%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.10%	10.17%	-0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.27%	12.86%	-0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.96%	17.35%	-7.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.28%	19.08%	-7.80%

TRND vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRND has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRND vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison

TRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than SCHK's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF	1.03%	1.09%	1.20%	1.38%	1.57%	1.17%	1.58%	1.82%	1.80%	0.31%
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF	2.14%	2.32%	2.31%	2.51%	1.76%	0.93%	0.60%	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRND and SCHK in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, TRND and SCHK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TRND or SCHK?

TRND has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to SCHK (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRND dropped -17.88% vs SCHK's -34.80%.

Which ETF is better, TRND or SCHK?

On 5-year performance, SCHK leads with 12.32% vs 5.64% for TRND. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TRND or SCHK?

Over the 5-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 12.32% return vs 5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRND or SCHK?

SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRND or SCHK?

TRND has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.03% for SCHK.

What is the main difference between TRND and SCHK?

TRND tracks Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index, while SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TRND and 0.03% for SCHK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.