PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHK vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHK vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHK achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 0.39% return.


SCHK

1D
0.61%
1M
0.08%
6M
8.83%
YTD
10.36%
1Y
21.37%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.45%

VONG

1D
0.84%
1M
-2.27%
6M
1.82%
YTD
0.39%
1Y
10.18%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
17.43%
ALL TIME*
16.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$28.76M$27.18M$27.56M
$121.41M$148.04M$174.70M

SCHK vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHK
Schwab 1000 Index ETF
10.36%17.23%24.48%26.63%-19.51%26.17%20.75%31.31%-5.09%5.24%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.39%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%6.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHK and VONG is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017

0.94

The correlation between SCHK and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHK vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHK
VONG

Technology

36.7%
54.3%

Financial Services

11.8%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
8.4%

Industrials

9.5%
9.0%

Communication Services

9.4%
16.2%

Healthcare

9.2%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
1.2%

Energy

3.1%
0.5%

Utilities

2.2%
0.3%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
0.3%

Technology

SCHK
36.7%
VONG
54.3%

Financial Services

SCHK
11.8%
VONG
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHK
9.6%
VONG
8.4%

Industrials

SCHK
9.5%
VONG
9.0%

Communication Services

SCHK
9.4%
VONG
16.2%

Healthcare

SCHK
9.2%
VONG
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

SCHK
4.5%
VONG
1.2%

Energy

SCHK
3.1%
VONG
0.5%

Utilities

SCHK
2.2%
VONG
0.3%

Real Estate

SCHK
2.2%
VONG
0.4%

Basic Materials

SCHK
1.9%
VONG
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHK vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCHK
SCHK Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SCHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHK Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHK Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCHK vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHKVONGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.09

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

0.50

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.29

1.48

+7.81

SCHK vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHK Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHK and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHK vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHK drawdown since its inception was -34.80%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHK and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHKVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.80%

-32.72%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-16.23%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-23.27%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-32.72%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-7.89%

+6.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-4.89%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

5.42%

-3.33%

Volatility

SCHK vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) is 3.51%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that SCHK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHKVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

6.45%

-2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

14.00%

-3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

17.45%

-4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

21.64%

-4.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.04%

21.01%

-1.97%

SCHK vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHK has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHK vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

SCHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than VONG's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHK
Schwab 1000 Index ETF
1.04%1.09%1.20%1.38%1.57%1.17%1.58%1.82%1.80%0.31%0.00%0.00%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.48%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SCHK and VONG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VONG has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to SCHK (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHK dropped -34.80% vs VONG's -32.72%.

On 5-year performance, SCHK leads with 12.06% vs 11.83% for VONG. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONG.

SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.48% for VONG.

SCHK is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHK and 0.06% for VONG.

SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHK and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer