PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHK vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHK vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHK achieves a 11.04% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 7.17% return.


SCHK

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.06%
YTD
11.04%
6M
10.97%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
13.14%
10Y*

VONG

1D
-1.32%
1M
5.68%
YTD
7.17%
6M
6.52%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
15.38%
10Y*
18.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHK vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHK
Schwab 1000 Index ETF
11.04%17.23%24.48%26.63%-19.51%26.17%20.75%31.31%-5.09%5.07%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
7.17%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%6.09%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHK and VONG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017

0.94

The correlation between SCHK and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHK vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHK
VONG

Technology

35.1%
51.4%

Financial Services

12.0%
5.3%

Communication Services

10.3%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
13.2%

Industrials

9.2%
5.7%

Healthcare

8.6%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
2.7%

Energy

3.6%
0.4%

Utilities

2.3%
0.3%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.4%

Basic Materials

2.0%
0.3%

Technology

SCHK
35.1%
VONG
51.4%

Financial Services

SCHK
12.0%
VONG
5.3%

Communication Services

SCHK
10.3%
VONG
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHK
10.1%
VONG
13.2%

Industrials

SCHK
9.2%
VONG
5.7%

Healthcare

SCHK
8.6%
VONG
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

SCHK
4.7%
VONG
2.7%

Energy

SCHK
3.6%
VONG
0.4%

Utilities

SCHK
2.3%
VONG
0.3%

Real Estate

SCHK
2.2%
VONG
0.4%

Basic Materials

SCHK
2.0%
VONG
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHK vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHK
SCHK Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SCHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHK Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHK Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHK vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHKVONGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

1.59

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.34

5.34

+9.00

SCHK vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHK Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHK and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHKVONGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

1.68

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.72

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.90

-0.12

Drawdowns

SCHK vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHK drawdown since its inception was -34.80%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHK and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHKVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.80%

-32.72%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-16.23%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-23.27%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-32.72%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-1.66%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-4.88%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

4.83%

-2.89%

Volatility

SCHK vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) is 2.98%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that SCHK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHKVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

3.60%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.17%

11.61%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.16%

15.37%

-3.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

21.33%

-4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

20.87%

-1.75%

SCHK vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHK vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

SCHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than VONG's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHK
Schwab 1000 Index ETF
1.01%1.09%1.20%1.38%1.57%1.17%1.58%1.82%1.80%0.31%0.00%0.00%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.43%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SCHK and VONG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VONG has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to SCHK (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHK dropped -34.80% vs VONG's -32.72%.

On 5-year performance, VONG leads with 15.38% vs 13.14% for SCHK. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VONG has performed better with a 15.38% return vs 13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONG.

SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.43% for VONG.

SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHK and 0.06% for VONG.

SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHK and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer