SCHK vs. VONG
SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SCHK tracks the Schwab 1000 Index while VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHK returned 13.14%/yr vs 15.38%/yr for VONG. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.
Performance
SCHK vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHK achieves a 11.04% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 7.17% return.
SCHK
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 11.04%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- —
VONG
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 6.52%
- 1Y
- 25.74%
- 3Y*
- 24.92%
- 5Y*
- 15.38%
- 10Y*
- 18.61%
SCHK vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 11.04% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 26.63% | -19.51% | 26.17% | 20.75% | 31.31% | -5.09% | 5.07% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 7.17% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 6.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHK and VONG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SCHK and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHK vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHK
VONG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SCHK
VONG
Financial Services
SCHK
VONG
Communication Services
SCHK
VONG
Consumer Cyclical
SCHK
VONG
Industrials
SCHK
VONG
Healthcare
SCHK
VONG
Consumer Defensive
SCHK
VONG
Energy
SCHK
VONG
Utilities
SCHK
VONG
Real Estate
SCHK
VONG
Basic Materials
SCHK
VONG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHK vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
SCHK
VONG
SCHK vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHK | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.29 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 1.59 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.34 | 5.34 | +9.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHK | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 1.68 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.72 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.90 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
SCHK vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHK drawdown since its inception was -34.80%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHK and VONG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHK | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.80% | -32.72% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.97% | -16.23% | +7.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -23.27% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -32.72% | +7.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -1.66% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -4.88% | -0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 4.83% | -2.89% |
Volatility
SCHK vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) is 2.98%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that SCHK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHK | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 3.60% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.17% | 11.61% | -2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 15.37% | -3.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 21.33% | -4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 20.87% | -1.75% |
SCHK vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHK vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
SCHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than VONG's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SCHK and VONG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VONG has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to SCHK (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHK dropped -34.80% vs VONG's -32.72%.
On 5-year performance, VONG leads with 15.38% vs 13.14% for SCHK. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VONG has performed better with a 15.38% return vs 13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONG.
SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.43% for VONG.
SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHK and 0.06% for VONG.
SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHK and VONG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer