PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRND vs. LRGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TRND vs. LRGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TRND vs. LRGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TRND
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
-1.81%6.03%11.97%5.86%
LRGC
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
-5.45%16.23%24.92%9.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRND achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly higher than LRGC's -5.45% return.


TRND

1D
1.95%
1M
-5.56%
YTD
-1.81%
6M
0.62%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
4.46%
10Y*

LRGC

1D
2.88%
1M
-4.95%
YTD
-5.45%
6M
-3.88%
1Y
15.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TRND vs. LRGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRND has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than LRGC's 0.48% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TRND vs. LRGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRND
TRND Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRND Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRND Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

LRGC
LRGC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LRGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRGC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LRGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRGC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRND vs. LRGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRNDLRGCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

0.85

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.71

1.34

-0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.20

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

1.36

-0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.03

5.56

-3.53

TRND vs. LRGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRND Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the LRGC Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRND and LRGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRNDLRGCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

0.85

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.14

-0.62

Correlation

The correlation between TRND and LRGC is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TRND vs. LRGC - Dividend Comparison

TRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than LRGC's 0.61% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
TRND
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
2.36%2.32%2.31%2.51%1.76%0.93%0.60%0.93%
LRGC
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
0.61%0.58%0.46%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TRND vs. LRGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRND drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum LRGC drawdown of -19.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRND and LRGC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TRNDLRGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.88%

-19.38%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.00%

-11.76%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.21%

-7.41%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-2.22%

-3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.88%

-0.40%

Volatility

TRND vs. LRGC - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) have volatilities of 5.21% and 5.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TRNDLRGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

5.35%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.73%

9.35%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.80%

18.06%

-7.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.53%

15.42%

-5.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.13%

15.42%

-4.29%