PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRGC vs. ESGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LRGC vs. ESGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LRGC vs. ESGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LRGC
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
-5.45%16.23%24.92%9.30%
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
-6.94%16.48%24.69%10.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGC achieves a -5.45% return, which is significantly higher than ESGV's -6.94% return.


LRGC

1D
2.88%
1M
-4.95%
YTD
-5.45%
6M
-3.88%
1Y
15.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ESGV

1D
3.40%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
-6.94%
6M
-4.73%
1Y
15.76%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LRGC vs. ESGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LRGC vs. ESGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGC
LRGC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LRGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRGC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LRGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRGC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGV
ESGV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ESGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGC vs. ESGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LRGCESGVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

0.81

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.19

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.56

5.29

+0.27

LRGC vs. ESGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the ESGV Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGC and ESGV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LRGCESGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.81

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.61

+0.53

Correlation

The correlation between LRGC and ESGV is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LRGC vs. ESGV - Dividend Comparison

LRGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than ESGV's 1.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LRGC
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
0.61%0.58%0.46%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
1.01%0.91%1.04%1.16%1.42%0.95%1.11%1.27%0.28%

Drawdowns

LRGC vs. ESGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGC drawdown since its inception was -19.38%, smaller than the maximum ESGV drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGC and ESGV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LRGCESGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.38%

-33.66%

+14.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-12.28%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.41%

-8.60%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.22%

-6.55%

+4.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

3.08%

-0.20%

Volatility

LRGC vs. ESGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) is 5.35%, while Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that LRGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LRGCESGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

6.09%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.35%

10.58%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.06%

19.47%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

18.33%

-2.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.42%

20.72%

-5.30%