TRND vs. FEAC
TRND (Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF) and FEAC (Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. TRND is passively managed, while FEAC is actively managed. Over the past year, TRND returned 21.50% vs 30.51% for FEAC. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRND charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for FEAC.
Performance
TRND vs. FEAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRND achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than FEAC's 12.79% return.
TRND
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 21.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- —
FEAC
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 12.79%
- 6M
- 13.05%
- 1Y
- 30.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRND vs. FEAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | 10.26% | 6.03% | -1.48% |
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 12.79% | 18.01% | -1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRND and FEAC is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.90 |
The correlation between TRND and FEAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRND vs. FEAC — Risk / Return Rank
TRND
FEAC
TRND vs. FEAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRND | FEAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 3.76 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 16.43 | -5.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRND | FEAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 2.45 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.11 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
TRND vs. FEAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRND drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum FEAC drawdown of -18.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRND and FEAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRND | FEAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.88% | -18.96% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.00% | -8.15% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.21% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -2.55% | -2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 1.86% | +0.04% |
Volatility
TRND vs. FEAC - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) at 3.01%. This indicates that TRND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRND | FEAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | 3.01% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.97% | 9.16% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.23% | 12.50% | -1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.71% | 17.48% | -7.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.18% | 17.48% | -6.30% |
TRND vs. FEAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRND has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FEAC's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRND vs. FEAC - Dividend Comparison
TRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than FEAC's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 0.85% | 0.94% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | 2.10% | 2.32% | 2.31% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, TRND and FEAC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TRND has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to FEAC (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRND dropped -17.88% vs FEAC's -18.96%.
On 1-year performance, FEAC leads with 30.51% vs 21.50% for TRND. On fees, FEAC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FEAC has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FEAC has performed better with a 30.51% return vs 21.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEAC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.
TRND has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.85% for FEAC.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TRND and 0.18% for FEAC.
FEAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRND and FEAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer