PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEAC vs. DYNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEAC vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FEAC having a 9.92% return and DYNF slightly higher at 10.04%.


FEAC

1D
-1.46%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
9.92%
6M
8.83%
1Y
26.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DYNF

1D
-1.62%
1M
0.13%
YTD
10.04%
6M
8.91%
1Y
27.42%
3Y*
25.19%
5Y*
14.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAC vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FEAC
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
9.92%18.01%-1.87%
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
10.04%20.00%-0.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAC and DYNF is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.95

The correlation between FEAC and DYNF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEAC vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAC
FEAC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FEAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FEAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

DYNF
DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAC vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEACDYNFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

3.18

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

14.86

-1.22

FEAC vs. DYNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the DYNF Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAC and DYNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEAC vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAC drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum DYNF drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAC and DYNF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEACDYNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-34.72%

+15.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-8.67%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-1.97%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.54%

-5.94%

+3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.85%

+0.09%

Volatility

FEAC vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) have volatilities of 5.35% and 5.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEACDYNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

5.38%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

10.64%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.30%

13.24%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

17.62%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

19.91%

-2.27%

FEAC vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DYNF's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FEAC vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison

FEAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than DYNF's 0.81% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
0.81%1.01%0.65%1.11%1.66%2.89%1.52%1.22%
FEAC
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
0.79%0.94%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FEAC and DYNF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DYNF has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to FEAC (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAC dropped -18.96% vs DYNF's -34.72%.

On 1-year performance, DYNF leads with 27.42% vs 26.41% for FEAC. On fees, FEAC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 27.42% return vs 26.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEAC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DYNF.

DYNF has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.79% for FEAC.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FEAC and 0.26% for DYNF.

DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEAC and DYNF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer