TRND vs. DCMT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TRND (Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. TRND is passively managed, while DCMT is actively managed. Over the past year, TRND returned 17.02% vs 28.33% for DCMT. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRND charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.

Performance

TRND vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRND achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 25.74% return.

TRND

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -0.72%
• 6M: 5.80%
• YTD: 8.53%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 9.94%
• 5Y*: 5.64%
• 10Y*: —

DCMT

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: -0.52%
• 6M: 21.60%
• YTD: 25.74%
• 1Y: 28.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRND vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF	8.53%	6.03%	12.02%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	25.74%	6.04%	3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between TRND and DCMT is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	0.00

The correlation between TRND and DCMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TRND vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRND

TRND Risk / Return Rank: 53
TRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
TRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
TRND Omega Ratio Rank: 50
TRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
TRND Martin Ratio Rank: 61

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 51
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 53
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRND vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRND	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.52	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	2.11	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.27	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	1.78	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.65	6.45	+2.19

TRND vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRND Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRND and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TRND vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRND drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, which is greater than DCMT's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRND and DCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRND	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.88%	-15.96%	-1.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.00%	-15.96%	+7.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.95%	-9.74%	+7.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.16%	-3.51%	-1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	4.40%	-2.43%

Volatility

TRND vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) is 4.47%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that TRND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRND	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	6.10%	-1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.10%	16.86%	-6.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.27%	18.80%	-6.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.96%	16.03%	-6.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.28%	16.03%	-4.75%

TRND vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRND has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRND vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

TRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than DCMT's 2.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.92%	3.67%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF	2.14%	2.32%	2.31%	2.51%	1.76%	0.93%	0.60%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRND and DCMT in my portfolio?

TRND and DCMT have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRND or DCMT?

DCMT has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to TRND (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRND dropped -17.88% vs DCMT's -15.96%.

Which ETF is better, TRND or DCMT?

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 28.33% vs 17.02% for TRND. On fees, DCMT is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, TRND has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TRND or DCMT?

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 28.33% return vs 17.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRND or DCMT?

DCMT is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRND or DCMT?

DCMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 2.14% for TRND.

What is the main difference between TRND and DCMT?

TRND is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TRND and 0.66% for DCMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.