PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCMT vs. ISCMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCMT vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCMT achieves a 21.22% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.


DCMT

1D
-0.72%
1M
-10.09%
YTD
21.22%
6M
20.69%
1Y
20.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISCMF

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
22.87%
6M
22.87%
1Y
31.30%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCMT vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DCMT
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
21.22%6.04%3.65%
ISCMF
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
22.87%19.65%3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between DCMT and ISCMF is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCMT vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCMT
DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCMF
ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCMT vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DCMTISCMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

2.31

-1.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

5.53

-3.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.77

11.95

-5.18

DCMT vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCMT and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DCMT vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCMT drawdown since its inception was -12.98%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCMT and ISCMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCMTISCMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.98%

-25.42%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.98%

-5.69%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.98%

-5.26%

-7.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.27%

-13.36%

+10.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

2.63%

+0.69%

Volatility

DCMT vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) is 4.59%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that DCMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCMTISCMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

5.11%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.28%

15.45%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

17.87%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

14.29%

+1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.85%

14.29%

+1.56%

DCMT vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCMT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCMT vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

DCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
DCMT
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
3.03%3.67%1.59%
ISCMF
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCMT and ISCMF have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISCMF has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to DCMT (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCMT dropped -12.98% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

On 1-year performance, ISCMF leads with 31.30% vs 20.08% for DCMT. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DCMT has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 31.30% return vs 20.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

DCMT has the higher dividend yield at 3.03%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for DCMT and 0.19% for ISCMF.

ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCMT and ISCMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer