TRND vs. BSV
TRND (Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF) and BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TRND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index, while BSV is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRND returned 6.30%/yr vs 1.66%/yr for BSV. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRND charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BSV.
Performance
TRND vs. BSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRND achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than BSV's 0.21% return.
TRND
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 11.97%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- —
BSV
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.66%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
TRND vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | 10.42% | 6.03% | 11.97% | 16.48% | -15.37% | 12.95% | 4.73% | 8.58% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 0.21% | 6.00% | 3.78% | 4.90% | -5.49% | -1.09% | 4.70% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRND and BSV is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019 | 0.13 |
Over the past year, TRND and BSV have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRND vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank
TRND
BSV
TRND vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRND | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 2.53 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | 8.35 | +3.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRND vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRND drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, which is greater than BSV's maximum drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRND and BSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRND | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.88% | -8.54% | -9.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.00% | -1.29% | -6.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.56% | -1.53% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | -8.54% | -7.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.70% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -0.97% | -4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 0.39% | +1.55% |
Volatility
TRND vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) at 0.59%. This indicates that TRND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRND | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 0.59% | +4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.79% | 1.33% | +8.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 1.82% | +10.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.89% | 2.73% | +7.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.26% | 2.38% | +8.88% |
TRND vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRND has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRND vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison
TRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than BSV's 4.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 4.00% | 3.83% | 3.38% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.48% | 1.40% |
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | 2.10% | 2.32% | 2.31% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRND and BSV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRND has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to BSV (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRND dropped -17.88% vs BSV's -8.54%.
On 5-year performance, TRND leads with 6.30% vs 1.66% for BSV. On fees, BSV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BSV has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TRND has performed better with a 6.30% return vs 1.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.
BSV has the higher dividend yield at 4.00%, compared with 2.10% for TRND.
TRND is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BSV is Short-Term Bond. TRND tracks Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index, while BSV tracks Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TRND and 0.03% for BSV.
TRND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRND and BSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer