BSV vs. SCHO
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO).
BSV and SCHO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BSV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. 1-5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. SCHO is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury (1-3 Y) (Inception 4/30/1996). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010. Both BSV and SCHO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BSV or SCHO.
Key characteristics
| BSV | SCHO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.23% | 4.50% |
| 1Y Return | 5.54% | 6.86% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.76% | 2.39% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.24% | 2.23% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.57% | 2.06% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.27 | 3.42 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.49 | 6.02 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.44 | 1.82 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.38 | 7.18 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.65 | 21.04 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.60% | 0.33% |
| Daily Std Dev | 2.55% | 2.06% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.54% | -5.28% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.38% | -0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSV and SCHO is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BSV vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BSV achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly lower than SCHO's 4.50% return. Over the past 10 years, BSV has underperformed SCHO with an annualized return of 1.57%, while SCHO has yielded a comparatively higher 2.06% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSV vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHO's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BSV vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BSV vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison
BSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than SCHO's 5.74% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF | 3.26% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.49% | 1.40% | 1.45% | 1.48% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 5.74% | 5.58% | 2.14% | 0.61% | 1.91% | 3.20% | 2.43% | 1.73% | 1.36% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 0.52% |
Drawdowns
BSV vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSV drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, which is greater than SCHO's maximum drawdown of -5.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSV and SCHO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BSV vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV) has a higher volatility of 0.59% compared to Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) at 0.40%. This indicates that BSV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.