TRND vs. AAUS
TRND (Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF) and AAUS (Alpha Architect US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. TRND is passively managed, while AAUS is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRND charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AAUS.
Performance
TRND vs. AAUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TRND having a 7.26% return and AAUS slightly lower at 7.23%.
TRND
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 7.26%
- 6M
- 7.26%
- 1Y
- 18.58%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.68%
- 10Y*
- —
AAUS
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 7.23%
- 6M
- 6.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRND vs. AAUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | 7.26% | 6.08% |
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF | 7.23% | 9.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRND and AAUS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRND vs. AAUS — Risk / Return Rank
TRND
AAUS
TRND vs. AAUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRND | AAUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.74 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRND | AAUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.62 | -1.00 |
Drawdowns
TRND vs. AAUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRND drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, which is greater than AAUS's maximum drawdown of -9.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRND and AAUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRND | AAUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.88% | -9.13% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -2.78% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -1.31% | -3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | — | — |
Volatility
TRND vs. AAUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRND | AAUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.57% | 12.71% | -1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.78% | 12.71% | -2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.22% | 12.71% | -1.49% |
TRND vs. AAUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRND has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than AAUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRND vs. AAUS - Dividend Comparison
TRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than AAUS's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | 2.16% | 2.32% | 2.31% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, TRND and AAUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, AAUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.
TRND has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.34% for AAUS.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TRND and 0.15% for AAUS.
Find the right allocation for TRND and AAUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer