AAUS vs. FTAG

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

AAUS (Alpha Architect US Equity ETF) and FTAG (First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. AAUS is actively managed, while FTAG is passively managed. Over the past year, AAUS returned 22.31% vs 13.22% for FTAG. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AAUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FTAG.

Performance

AAUS vs. FTAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAUS achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly lower than FTAG's 11.55% return.

AAUS

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 0.39%
• 6M: 7.72%
• YTD: 8.78%
• 1Y: 22.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.32%

FTAG

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: -1.11%
• 6M: 3.82%
• YTD: 11.55%
• 1Y: 13.22%
• 3Y*: 2.62%
• 5Y*: 1.86%
• 10Y*: 5.40%
• ALL TIME*: -8.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF	$2.43M	$1.38M	$531.78K
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF	$71.78K	$63.89K	$178.26K

AAUS vs. FTAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF	8.78%	10.11%
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF	11.55%	-1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between AAUS and FTAG is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

AAUS vs. FTAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AAUS

AAUS Risk / Return Rank: 66
AAUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
AAUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
AAUS Omega Ratio Rank: 63
AAUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
AAUS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

FTAG

FTAG Risk / Return Rank: 33
FTAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FTAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FTAG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FTAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FTAG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AAUS vs. FTAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAUS	FTAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	0.83	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	1.27	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.15	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	1.24	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.93	2.74	+6.19

AAUS vs. FTAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the FTAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAUS and FTAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAUS vs. FTAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAUS drawdown since its inception was -9.13%, smaller than the maximum FTAG drawdown of -90.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUS and FTAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAUS	FTAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.13%	-90.89%	+81.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.13%	-9.56%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.77%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.38%	-78.42%	+77.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.43%	-71.30%	+69.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	4.33%	-2.12%

Volatility

AAUS vs. FTAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS) is 3.54%, while First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that AAUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAUS	FTAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	4.15%	-0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.80%	11.27%	-1.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.90%	14.31%	-1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.77%	17.42%	-4.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.77%	19.44%	-6.67%

AAUS vs. FTAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FTAG's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAUS vs. FTAG - Dividend Comparison

AAUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than FTAG's 1.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF	0.34%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF	1.30%	1.39%	2.89%	3.68%	1.77%	1.58%	1.72%	2.33%	2.16%	1.26%	0.61%	1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAUS and FTAG in my portfolio?

AAUS and FTAG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAUS or FTAG?

FTAG has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to AAUS (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAUS dropped -9.13% vs FTAG's -90.89%.

Which ETF is better, AAUS or FTAG?

On 1-year performance, AAUS leads with 22.31% vs 13.22% for FTAG. On fees, AAUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AAUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAUS or FTAG?

Over the 1-year period, AAUS has performed better with a 22.31% return vs 13.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAUS or FTAG?

AAUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTAG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAUS or FTAG?

FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.34% for AAUS.

What is the main difference between AAUS and FTAG?

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAUS and 0.70% for FTAG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.