TRMD vs. CF
TRMD (TORM plc) and CF (CF Industries Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. TRMD operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while CF operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, TRMD returned 45.54%/yr vs 24.12%/yr for CF. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TRMD vs. CF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TRMD having a 62.58% return and CF slightly higher at 63.40%.
TRMD
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 15.47%
- 6M
- 30.79%
- YTD
- 62.58%
- 1Y
- 81.24%
- 3Y*
- 23.55%
- 5Y*
- 45.54%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.15%
CF
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 15.75%
- 6M
- 35.55%
- YTD
- 63.40%
- 1Y
- 37.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 24.12%
- 10Y*
- 20.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $259.19M | $278.77M | $321.72M | |
TRMD TORM plc | $12.60M | $14.18M | $25.44M |
TRMD vs. CF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMD TORM plc | 62.58% | 11.21% | -23.37% | 31.64% | 297.66% | 12.91% | -25.94% | 84.18% | -22.59% |
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 63.40% | -7.17% | 10.08% | -4.75% | 22.29% | 87.18% | -15.76% | 12.73% | 3.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRMD and CF is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2018 | 0.18 |
The correlation between TRMD and CF shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TRMD:
$3.10B
CF:
$19.23B
TRMD:
$3.40
CF:
$11.18
TRMD:
8.92
CF:
11.20
TRMD:
0.09
CF:
0.18
TRMD:
2.18
CF:
2.66
TRMD:
1.38
CF:
2.34
TRMD:
$1.41B
CF:
$7.41B
TRMD:
$575.03M
CF:
$2.99B
TRMD:
$639.99M
CF:
$2.60B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRMD vs. CF — Risk / Return Rank
TRMD
CF
TRMD vs. CF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TORM plc (TRMD) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRMD | CF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.18 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 1.49 | +1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.61 | 3.31 | +5.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRMD vs. CF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRMD drawdown since its inception was -60.59%, smaller than the maximum CF drawdown of -76.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMD and CF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRMD | CF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.59% | -76.73% | +16.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.53% | -25.45% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.59% | -29.16% | -31.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.59% | -48.36% | -12.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.05% | -8.65% | -2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.43% | -24.87% | +2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.47% | 11.44% | -1.97% |
Volatility
TRMD vs. CF - Volatility Comparison
TORM plc (TRMD) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) at 10.07%. This indicates that TRMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRMD | CF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 10.07% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.46% | 35.61% | -7.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.65% | 42.03% | -4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.24% | 38.14% | +8.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.53% | 40.08% | +19.45% |
Dividends
TRMD vs. CF - Dividend Comparison
TRMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, more than CF's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 1.60% | 2.59% | 2.34% | 2.01% | 1.76% | 1.70% | 3.10% | 2.51% | 2.76% | 2.82% | 3.81% | 2.94% |
TRMD TORM plc | 7.98% | 10.32% | 30.13% | 23.05% | 6.99% | 0.00% | 14.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TRMD vs. CF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TORM plc and CF Industries Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRMD vs. CF - Profitability Comparison
TRMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TORM plc reported a gross profit of 157.74M and revenue of 395.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.9%.
CF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 746.00M and revenue of 1.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.6%.
TRMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TORM plc reported an operating income of 135.10M and revenue of 395.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.1%.
CF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
TRMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TORM plc reported a net income of 120.52M and revenue of 395.84M, resulting in a net margin of 30.5%.
CF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 615.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in a net margin of 31.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRMD and CF have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRMD has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to CF (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRMD dropped -60.59% vs CF's -76.73%.
TRMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRMD and CF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer