PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRMD vs. ZIM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

TRMD vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TORM plc (TRMD) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TRMD vs. ZIM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TRMD
TORM plc
46.25%11.21%-23.37%31.64%297.66%6.85%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
28.30%28.11%176.93%-21.06%-52.70%463.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRMD:

$2.78B

ZIM:

$3.18B

EPS

TRMD:

$2.85

ZIM:

$3.98

PE Ratio

TRMD:

9.78

ZIM:

6.63

PEG Ratio

TRMD:

0.10

ZIM:

0.04

PS Ratio

TRMD:

2.09

ZIM:

0.46

PB Ratio

TRMD:

1.27

ZIM:

0.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRMD:

$1.34B

ZIM:

$6.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRMD:

$582.69M

ZIM:

$1.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

TRMD:

$580.07M

ZIM:

$2.27B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRMD achieves a 46.25% return, which is significantly higher than ZIM's 28.30% return.


TRMD

1D
1.90%
1M
-4.96%
YTD
46.25%
6M
42.74%
1Y
86.19%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
41.12%
10Y*

ZIM

1D
1.82%
1M
-5.52%
YTD
28.30%
6M
104.13%
1Y
98.85%
3Y*
37.85%
5Y*
32.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRMD vs. ZIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRMD
TRMD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TRMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRMD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TRMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRMD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIM
ZIM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ZIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRMD vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TORM plc (TRMD) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRMDZIMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

1.57

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.81

2.42

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.30

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.20

2.68

+1.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.02

6.03

+4.99

TRMD vs. ZIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the ZIM Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRMD and ZIM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRMDZIMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

1.57

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.49

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.80

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between TRMD and ZIM is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TRMD vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison

TRMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, which matches ZIM's 7.55% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
TRMD
TORM plc
7.60%10.32%30.13%23.05%6.99%0.00%14.89%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
7.55%20.16%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%0.00%

Drawdowns

TRMD vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRMD drawdown since its inception was -60.59%, smaller than the maximum ZIM drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMD and ZIM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TRMDZIMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.59%

-84.68%

+24.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.49%

-32.64%

+13.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.59%

-84.68%

+24.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.44%

-6.94%

-6.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-41.12%

+18.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.43%

14.49%

-7.06%

Volatility

TRMD vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison

TORM plc (TRMD) has a higher volatility of 14.99% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) at 9.55%. This indicates that TRMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TRMDZIMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.99%

9.55%

+5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.39%

40.45%

-14.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.54%

63.53%

-23.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.89%

67.47%

-21.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.26%

68.52%

-8.26%

Financials

TRMD vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TORM plc and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
354.98M
1.48B
(TRMD) Total Revenue
(ZIM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TRMD vs. ZIM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TORM plc and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
38.0%
5.6%
Portfolio components
TRMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TORM plc reported a gross profit of 134.80M and revenue of 354.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.0%.

ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 83.60M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.6%.

TRMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TORM plc reported an operating income of 98.16M and revenue of 354.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of 3.20M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

TRMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TORM plc reported a net income of 87.39M and revenue of 354.98M, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of 38.10M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.