PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TRFK vs. IGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TRFK vs. IGF

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TRFK returned 48.69%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for IGF. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRFK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.

Performance

TRFK vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRFK achieves a 57.84% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 9.68% return.

TRFK

1D
1.49%
1M
11.87%
YTD
57.84%
6M
56.78%
1Y
84.43%
3Y*
48.69%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

IGF

1D
0.67%
1M
0.31%
YTD
9.68%
6M
10.24%
1Y
16.24%
3Y*
16.28%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
8.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRFK vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF		57.84%26.81%38.30%66.63%-10.61%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF		9.68%21.31%14.81%6.14%-8.04%

Correlation

The correlation between TRFK and IGF is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022

0.38

The correlation between TRFK and IGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TRFK vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TRFK
IGF

Technology

91.8%

-

Industrials

8.3%
38.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

20.1%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

41.1%

Technology

TRFK
91.8%
IGF

-

Industrials

TRFK
8.3%
IGF
38.8%

Basic Materials

TRFK

-

IGF

-

Communication Services

TRFK

-

IGF

-

Consumer Cyclical

TRFK

-

IGF

-

Consumer Defensive

TRFK

-

IGF

-

Energy

TRFK

-

IGF
20.1%

Financial Services

TRFK

-

IGF

-

Healthcare

TRFK

-

IGF

-

Real Estate

TRFK

-

IGF
0.1%

Utilities

TRFK

-

IGF
41.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF

Often compared with TRFK:
TRFK vs. FDTXTRFK vs. DTCRTRFK vs. IDGTTRFK vs. FRATRFK vs. PRNTRFK vs. SPYGTRFK vs. VRGWX
Often compared with IGF:
IGF vs. IFRAIGF vs. GIIIGF vs. NFRAIGF vs. SPYIGF vs. GLIFXIGF vs. VPUIGF vs. XLU

Return for Risk

TRFK vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TRFK
TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
IGF
IGF Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRFK vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TRFKIGFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.79
1.55

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.30
2.22

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.27

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

2.78

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

8.03

+2.18

TRFK vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRFK Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRFK and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRFK vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRFK drawdown since its inception was -29.06%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFK and IGF.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TRFKIGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.06%

-58.33%

+29.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.56%

-5.87%

-13.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.06%

-14.28%

-14.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-20.83%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-42.11%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.18%

-2.98%

-4.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-11.86%

+5.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.29%

2.04%

+6.25%

Volatility

TRFK vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a higher volatility of 16.11% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.85%. This indicates that TRFK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TRFKIGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.11%

3.85%

+12.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.34%

8.73%

+16.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.41%

10.58%

+19.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.48%

14.00%

+15.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.48%

16.83%

+12.65%

TRFK vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRFK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRFK vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than IGF's 2.94% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF		2.94%3.23%3.21%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.98%3.25%
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF		0.01%0.01%0.40%0.20%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

TRFK and IGF have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRFK has higher volatility (16.11%) compared to IGF (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRFK dropped -29.06% vs IGF's -58.33%.

On 3-year performance, TRFK leads with 48.69% vs 16.28% for IGF. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 48.69% return vs 16.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TRFK.

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.

TRFK is categorized as Technology Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TRFK and 0.39% for IGF.

TRFK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRFK and IGF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer