TRFK vs. GCOW
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW).
TRFK and GCOW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TRFK is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Jun 8, 2022. GCOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2016. Both TRFK and GCOW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TRFK vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRFK vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | -2.84% | 26.81% | 38.30% | 66.63% | -10.61% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 13.21% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | -2.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRFK achieves a -2.84% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 13.21% return.
TRFK
- 1D
- 4.71%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- -2.84%
- 6M
- -6.98%
- 1Y
- 39.91%
- 3Y*
- 32.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCOW
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 13.21%
- 6M
- 20.65%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRFK vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TRFK and GCOW have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Return for Risk
TRFK vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
TRFK
GCOW
TRFK vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRFK | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | 2.27 | -0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 3.01 | -1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.44 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.77 | -0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 14.12 | -9.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRFK | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 2.27 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.60 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRFK and GCOW is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TRFK vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than GCOW's 4.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 0.20% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.39% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
TRFK vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRFK drawdown since its inception was -29.06%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFK and GCOW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRFK | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.06% | -37.64% | +8.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.56% | -11.05% | -8.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.77% | -1.84% | -13.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -5.90% | -0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.16% | 2.17% | +5.99% |
Volatility
TRFK vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a higher volatility of 9.98% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 4.03%. This indicates that TRFK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRFK | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.98% | 4.03% | +5.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.50% | 7.90% | +12.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.51% | 13.89% | +17.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.63% | 13.48% | +15.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.63% | 16.25% | +12.38% |