TRAK vs. WAB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB).

Performance

TRAK vs. WAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TRAK vs. WAB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TRAK Park City Group Inc	-38.40%	-43.84%	18.98%
WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation	17.22%	13.15%	4.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TRAK : $144.80M WAB : $42.73B
EPS TRAK : $0.38 WAB : $7.87
PE Ratio TRAK : 19.98 WAB : 31.77
PEG Ratio TRAK : 0.99 WAB : 0.72
PS Ratio TRAK : 6.18 WAB : 3.83
PB Ratio TRAK : 2.91 WAB : 3.82
Total Revenue (TTM) TRAK : $23.50M WAB : $11.17B
Gross Profit (TTM) TRAK : $19.97M WAB : $3.81B
EBITDA (TTM) TRAK : $8.12M WAB : $2.18B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRAK achieves a -38.40% return, which is significantly lower than WAB's 17.22% return.

TRAK

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: -12.41%
• YTD: -38.40%
• 6M: -48.50%
• 1Y: -62.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WAB

• 1D: 5.28%
• 1M: -5.32%
• YTD: 17.22%
• 6M: 24.96%
• 1Y: 38.49%
• 3Y*: 35.95%
• 5Y*: 26.62%
• 10Y*: 12.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TRAK vs. WAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRAK

TRAK Risk / Return Rank: 3
TRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
TRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
TRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 1
TRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
TRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 5

WAB

WAB Risk / Return Rank: 82
WAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
WAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
WAB Omega Ratio Rank: 80
WAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
WAB Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRAK vs. WAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRAK	WAB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.64	1.44	-3.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.94	2.06	-5.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.67	1.28	-0.61
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.91	2.76	-3.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.70	6.12	-7.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRAK vs. WAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRAK Sharpe Ratio is -1.64, which is lower than the WAB Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRAK and WAB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRAK	WAB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.64	1.44	-3.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.20	0.35	-1.55

Correlation

The correlation between TRAK and WAB is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TRAK vs. WAB - Dividend Comparison

TRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than WAB's 0.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TRAK Park City Group Inc	1.03%	0.62%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation	0.42%	0.47%	0.42%	0.54%	0.60%	0.52%	0.66%	0.62%	0.68%	0.54%	0.43%	0.39%

Drawdowns

TRAK vs. WAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRAK drawdown since its inception was -70.93%, roughly equal to the maximum WAB drawdown of -71.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRAK and WAB.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRAK	WAB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.93%	-71.85%	+0.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.67%	-13.82%	-54.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.55%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-64.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.02%	-5.62%	-63.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.28%	-24.10%	-4.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.83%	6.24%	+30.59%

Volatility

TRAK vs. WAB - Volatility Comparison

Park City Group Inc (TRAK) has a higher volatility of 11.61% compared to Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) at 8.79%. This indicates that TRAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRAK	WAB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.61%	8.79%	+2.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.48%	15.83%	+13.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.07%	26.83%	+11.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.81%	25.59%	+12.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.81%	31.23%	+6.58%

Financials

TRAK vs. WAB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Park City Group Inc and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TRAK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a gross profit of 5.00M and revenue of 5.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.4%.

WAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 966.00M and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.6%.

TRAK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Park City Group Inc reported an operating income of 1.82M and revenue of 5.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

WAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 356.00M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.0%.

TRAK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a net income of 1.69M and revenue of 5.86M, resulting in a net margin of 28.8%.

WAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 378.00M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.