PortfoliosLab logo
TRAK vs. WAB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TRAK and WAB is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

TRAK vs. WAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TRAK:

0.91

WAB:

0.86

Sortino Ratio

TRAK:

1.45

WAB:

1.31

Omega Ratio

TRAK:

1.18

WAB:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

TRAK:

1.27

WAB:

1.07

Martin Ratio

TRAK:

3.13

WAB:

3.21

Ulcer Index

TRAK:

11.22%

WAB:

7.84%

Daily Std Dev

TRAK:

37.87%

WAB:

28.02%

Max Drawdown

TRAK:

-96.87%

WAB:

-71.84%

Current Drawdown

TRAK:

-9.30%

WAB:

-1.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRAK:

$418.61M

WAB:

$35.20B

EPS

TRAK:

$0.31

WAB:

$6.44

PE Ratio

TRAK:

72.29

WAB:

31.94

PEG Ratio

TRAK:

2.13

WAB:

3.92

PS Ratio

TRAK:

19.75

WAB:

3.35

PB Ratio

TRAK:

8.73

WAB:

3.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRAK:

$22.03M

WAB:

$10.50B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRAK:

$18.41M

WAB:

$3.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

TRAK:

$8.28M

WAB:

$2.02B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRAK achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than WAB's 8.63% return. Over the past 10 years, TRAK has underperformed WAB with an annualized return of 7.43%, while WAB has yielded a comparatively higher 7.97% annualized return.


TRAK

YTD

1.36%

1M

11.00%

6M

3.88%

1Y

31.01%

5Y*

34.56%

10Y*

7.43%

WAB

YTD

8.63%

1M

20.34%

6M

5.53%

1Y

22.79%

5Y*

30.27%

10Y*

7.97%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TRAK vs. WAB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRAK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TRAK is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TRAK is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TRAK is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TRAK is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TRAK is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TRAK is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

WAB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WAB is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WAB is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WAB is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WAB is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WAB is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WAB is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TRAK vs. WAB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TRAK Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the WAB Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRAK and WAB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

TRAK vs. WAB - Dividend Comparison

TRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than WAB's 0.41% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TRAK
Park City Group Inc
0.31%0.31%0.76%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WAB
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
0.41%0.42%0.54%0.60%0.52%0.66%0.62%0.68%0.54%0.43%0.39%0.23%

Drawdowns

TRAK vs. WAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRAK drawdown since its inception was -96.87%, which is greater than WAB's maximum drawdown of -71.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRAK and WAB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

TRAK vs. WAB - Volatility Comparison

Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) have volatilities of 8.13% and 8.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

TRAK vs. WAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park City Group Inc and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
5.91M
2.61B
(TRAK) Total Revenue
(WAB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TRAK vs. WAB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Park City Group Inc and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
84.6%
34.5%
(TRAK) Gross Margin
(WAB) Gross Margin
TRAK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Park City Group Inc reported a gross profit of 5.00M and revenue of 5.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

WAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 900.00M and revenue of 2.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.5%.

TRAK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Park City Group Inc reported an operating income of 1.81M and revenue of 5.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.6%.

WAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 474.00M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

TRAK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Park City Group Inc reported a net income of 1.97M and revenue of 5.91M, resulting in a net margin of 33.2%.

WAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 322.00M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.