TRAK vs. FUL
TRAK (Park City Group Inc) and FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) are both stocks. TRAK operates in Software - Application (Technology), while FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past year, TRAK returned -52.99% vs -10.17% for FUL. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRAK vs. FUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRAK achieves a -27.62% return, which is significantly lower than FUL's -5.25% return.
TRAK
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -8.04%
- 6M
- -22.75%
- YTD
- -27.62%
- 1Y
- -52.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUL
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -12.13%
- 6M
- -13.96%
- YTD
- -5.25%
- 1Y
- -10.17%
- 3Y*
- -5.92%
- 5Y*
- -1.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.34%
TRAK vs. FUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TRAK Park City Group Inc | -27.62% | -43.84% | 19.37% |
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | -5.25% | -10.46% | -12.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRAK and FUL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
TRAK:
$161.93M
FUL:
$3.01B
TRAK:
$104.75
FUL:
$3.36
TRAK:
0.09
FUL:
16.65
TRAK:
0.03
FUL:
0.88
TRAK:
0.00
FUL:
1.48
TRAK:
$5.90B
FUL:
$3.51B
TRAK:
$5.09B
FUL:
$1.14B
TRAK:
$1.63B
FUL:
$511.88M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRAK vs. FUL — Risk / Return Rank
TRAK
FUL
TRAK vs. FUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRAK | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.97 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.42 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | -1.26 | -0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRAK vs. FUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRAK drawdown since its inception was -70.93%, roughly equal to the maximum FUL drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRAK and FUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRAK | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.93% | -68.25% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.46% | -26.97% | -35.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -43.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.60% | -33.40% | -30.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.62% | -18.78% | -14.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.38% | 9.16% | +31.22% |
Volatility
TRAK vs. FUL - Volatility Comparison
Park City Group Inc (TRAK) has a higher volatility of 13.11% compared to H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) at 11.36%. This indicates that TRAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRAK | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.11% | 11.36% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.47% | 28.21% | +6.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.06% | 33.74% | +10.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.93% | 29.70% | +11.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.93% | 31.17% | +9.76% |
Dividends
TRAK vs. FUL - Dividend Comparison
TRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than FUL's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.70% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.40% |
TRAK Park City Group Inc | 0.90% | 0.62% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TRAK vs. FUL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park City Group Inc and H.B. Fuller Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRAK vs. FUL - Profitability Comparison
TRAK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a gross profit of 5.08B and revenue of 5.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.
FUL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a gross profit of 322.24M and revenue of 950.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.
TRAK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Park City Group Inc reported an operating income of 2.25B and revenue of 5.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.3%.
FUL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported an operating income of 122.83M and revenue of 950.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.
TRAK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a net income of 1.99B and revenue of 5.88B, resulting in a net margin of 33.8%.
FUL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a net income of 67.81M and revenue of 950.27M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRAK and FUL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRAK has higher volatility (13.11%) compared to FUL (11.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRAK dropped -70.93% vs FUL's -68.25%.
FUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.34 vs -1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRAK and FUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer