TRAK vs. MU
TRAK (Park City Group Inc) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — TRAK in Software - Application, MU in Semiconductors. Over the past year, TRAK returned -47.27% vs 655.32% for MU. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TRAK vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRAK achieves a -31.44% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 188.53% return.
TRAK
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- -13.61%
- 6M
- -20.14%
- YTD
- -31.44%
- 1Y
- -47.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -34.92%
MU
- 1D
- -5.90%
- 1M
- -20.26%
- 6M
- 98.49%
- YTD
- 188.53%
- 1Y
- 655.32%
- 3Y*
- 127.41%
- 5Y*
- 61.18%
- 10Y*
- 51.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.28B | $42.78B | $49.13B | |
| $548.57K | $521.92K | $795.93K |
TRAK vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TRAK Park City Group Inc | -31.44% | -43.84% | 19.37% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 188.53% | 240.24% | -18.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRAK and MU is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
TRAK:
$153.38M
MU:
$929.52B
TRAK:
$104.75
MU:
$44.42
TRAK:
0.08
MU:
18.53
TRAK:
0.00
MU:
0.07
TRAK:
0.03
MU:
10.36
TRAK:
0.00
MU:
9.33
TRAK:
$5.90B
MU:
$90.27B
TRAK:
$5.09B
MU:
$65.51B
TRAK:
$1.63B
MU:
$44.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRAK vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
TRAK
MU
TRAK vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRAK | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.63 | -0.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 16.92 | -17.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 64.08 | -65.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRAK vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRAK drawdown since its inception was -70.93%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRAK and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRAK | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.93% | -98.25% | +27.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.72% | -39.10% | -20.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.52% | -32.17% | -33.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.65% | -58.02% | +23.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.97% | 10.31% | +27.66% |
Volatility
TRAK vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) is 11.08%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 31.11%. This indicates that TRAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRAK | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.08% | 31.11% | -20.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.14% | 67.64% | -32.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.50% | 81.13% | -36.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.88% | 56.32% | -15.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.88% | 51.42% | -10.54% |
Dividends
TRAK vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
TRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than MU's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
TRAK Park City Group Inc | 0.95% | 0.62% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TRAK vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park City Group Inc and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRAK vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
TRAK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a gross profit of 5.08B and revenue of 5.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
TRAK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Park City Group Inc reported an operating income of 2.25B and revenue of 5.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.3%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.
TRAK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a net income of 1.99B and revenue of 5.88B, resulting in a net margin of 33.8%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRAK and MU have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (31.11%) compared to TRAK (11.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRAK dropped -70.93% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRAK and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer