PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRAK vs. AYTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRAK vs. AYTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRAK achieves a -27.62% return, which is significantly lower than AYTU's -13.46% return.


TRAK

1D
-0.22%
1M
-8.04%
6M
-22.75%
YTD
-27.62%
1Y
-52.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AYTU

1D
2.27%
1M
4.65%
6M
-14.77%
YTD
-13.46%
1Y
3.21%
3Y*
7.92%
5Y*
-52.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRAK vs. AYTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TRAK
Park City Group Inc
-27.62%-43.84%19.37%
AYTU
Aytu BioPharma, Inc.
-13.46%52.94%-27.35%

Correlation

The correlation between TRAK and AYTU is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRAK:

$161.93M

AYTU:

$18.22M

EPS

TRAK:

$104.75

AYTU:

-$2.55

PS Ratio

TRAK:

0.03

AYTU:

0.53

PB Ratio

TRAK:

0.00

AYTU:

0.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRAK:

$5.90B

AYTU:

$56.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRAK:

$5.09B

AYTU:

$36.14M

EBITDA (TTM)

TRAK:

$1.63B

AYTU:

-$27.34M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRAK vs. AYTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRAK
TRAK Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

AYTU
AYTU Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AYTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AYTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AYTU Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
AYTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
AYTU Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRAK vs. AYTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRAKAYTUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.04

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

-0.05

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

-0.11

-1.26

TRAK vs. AYTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRAK Sharpe Ratio is -1.23, which is lower than the AYTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRAK and AYTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRAK vs. AYTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRAK drawdown since its inception was -70.93%, smaller than the maximum AYTU drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRAK and AYTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRAKAYTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.93%

-100.00%

+29.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.46%

-35.47%

-26.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.60%

-100.00%

+36.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.62%

-95.30%

+61.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.38%

16.48%

+23.90%

Volatility

TRAK vs. AYTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) is 13.11%, while Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU) has a volatility of 13.91%. This indicates that TRAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AYTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRAKAYTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.11%

13.91%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.47%

32.16%

+2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.06%

55.20%

-11.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.93%

85.27%

-44.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.93%

187.34%

-146.41%

Dividends

TRAK vs. AYTU - Dividend Comparison

TRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while AYTU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
AYTU
Aytu BioPharma, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRAK
Park City Group Inc
0.90%0.62%0.16%

Financials

TRAK vs. AYTU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park City Group Inc and Aytu BioPharma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
5.88B
12.41M
(TRAK) Total Revenue
(AYTU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TRAK vs. AYTU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Park City Group Inc and Aytu BioPharma, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
86.3%
61.2%
Portfolio components
TRAK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a gross profit of 5.08B and revenue of 5.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.

AYTU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Aytu BioPharma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.60M and revenue of 12.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.

TRAK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Park City Group Inc reported an operating income of 2.25B and revenue of 5.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.3%.

AYTU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Aytu BioPharma, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.06M and revenue of 12.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -32.8%.

TRAK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a net income of 1.99B and revenue of 5.88B, resulting in a net margin of 33.8%.

AYTU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Aytu BioPharma, Inc. reported a net income of -5.62M and revenue of 12.41M, resulting in a net margin of -45.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TRAK and AYTU have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AYTU has higher volatility (13.91%) compared to TRAK (13.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRAK dropped -70.93% vs AYTU's -100.00%.

AYTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRAK and AYTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer