TR vs. LEG
TR (Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.) and LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) are both stocks. TR operates in Confectioners (Consumer Defensive), while LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, TR returned 3.55%/yr vs -11.06%/yr for LEG. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TR vs. LEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TR achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly higher than LEG's -3.16% return. Over the past 10 years, TR has outperformed LEG with an annualized return of 3.55%, while LEG has yielded a comparatively lower -11.06% annualized return.
TR
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -4.05%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- 1Y
- 21.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.46%
- 10Y*
- 3.55%
LEG
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 15.59%
- YTD
- -3.16%
- 6M
- -7.69%
- 1Y
- 16.39%
- 3Y*
- -27.77%
- 5Y*
- -24.81%
- 10Y*
- -11.06%
TR vs. LEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TR Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 9.56% | 17.87% | 1.36% | -18.76% | 22.25% | 27.01% | -12.02% | 3.23% | -7.18% | -4.77% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | -3.16% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between TR and LEG is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987 | 0.28 |
The correlation between TR and LEG shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (3 years) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TR:
$2.92B
LEG:
$1.49B
TR:
$1.36
LEG:
$1.60
TR:
28.65
LEG:
6.62
TR:
3.88
LEG:
0.49
TR:
3.07
LEG:
1.44
TR:
$735.61M
LEG:
$3.03B
TR:
$257.59M
LEG:
$717.40M
TR:
$138.31M
LEG:
$433.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TR vs. LEG — Risk / Return Rank
TR
LEG
TR vs. LEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TR | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.09 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 0.44 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.44 | 0.90 | +1.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TR vs. LEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TR drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, smaller than the maximum LEG drawdown of -86.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TR and LEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TR | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.74% | -86.41% | +41.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.03% | -28.51% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.82% | -77.26% | +53.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.41% | -84.96% | +48.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.41% | -86.41% | +50.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.23% | -77.60% | +64.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.76% | -19.65% | +2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.89% | 13.77% | -4.88% |
Volatility
TR vs. LEG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) is 8.98%, while Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a volatility of 11.98%. This indicates that TR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TR | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.98% | 11.98% | -3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.67% | 31.40% | -14.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.33% | 49.76% | -23.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.93% | 42.50% | -17.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.24% | 39.81% | -14.57% |
Dividends
TR vs. LEG - Dividend Comparison
TR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than LEG's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 1.42% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
TR Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 0.91% | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.08% | 0.85% | 0.99% | 1.21% | 1.05% | 1.08% | 0.99% | 0.91% | 1.11% |
Financials
TR vs. LEG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TR and LEG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (11.98%) compared to TR (8.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TR dropped -44.74% vs LEG's -86.41%.
TR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TR and LEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer