TR vs. GRC
TR (Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.) and GRC (The Gorman-Rupp Company) are both stocks. TR operates in Confectioners (Consumer Defensive), while GRC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, TR returned 3.31%/yr vs 13.23%/yr for GRC. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TR vs. GRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TR achieves a 7.79% return, which is significantly lower than GRC's 67.38% return. Over the past 10 years, TR has underperformed GRC with an annualized return of 3.31%, while GRC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
TR
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- 7.58%
- YTD
- 7.79%
- 1Y
- 14.06%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- 3.31%
GRC
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- 6M
- 57.77%
- YTD
- 67.38%
- 1Y
- 114.11%
- 3Y*
- 44.21%
- 5Y*
- 20.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
TR vs. GRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TR Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 7.79% | 17.87% | 1.36% | -18.76% | 22.25% | 27.01% | -12.02% | 3.23% | -7.18% | -4.77% |
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 67.38% | 28.24% | 8.87% | 42.15% | -41.17% | 39.71% | -11.90% | 17.64% | 11.75% | 2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between TR and GRC is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TR and GRC has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
TR:
$2.87B
GRC:
$2.10B
TR:
$1.35
GRC:
$2.23
TR:
28.19
GRC:
35.61
TR:
2.37
GRC:
0.73
TR:
3.82
GRC:
3.01
TR:
3.02
GRC:
2.43
TR:
$735.61M
GRC:
$695.03M
TR:
$257.59M
GRC:
$210.01M
TR:
$138.31M
GRC:
$118.94M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TR vs. GRC — Risk / Return Rank
TR
GRC
TR vs. GRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TR | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.49 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 7.50 | -6.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.48 | 22.51 | -21.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TR vs. GRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TR drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, smaller than the maximum GRC drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TR and GRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TR | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.74% | -67.23% | +22.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.03% | -14.90% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.03% | -26.87% | +6.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.41% | -49.26% | +12.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.41% | -49.26% | +12.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.63% | -13.34% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.75% | -17.60% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.72% | 4.97% | +4.75% |
Volatility
TR vs. GRC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) is 10.95%, while The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) has a volatility of 13.36%. This indicates that TR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TR | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.95% | 13.36% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.06% | 30.14% | -11.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.41% | 36.09% | -8.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.11% | 31.08% | -5.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.35% | 34.08% | -8.73% |
Dividends
TR vs. GRC - Dividend Comparison
TR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than GRC's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 0.95% | 1.56% | 1.91% | 1.98% | 2.67% | 1.43% | 1.82% | 1.47% | 7.74% | 1.51% | 1.39% | 1.52% |
TR Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 0.93% | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.08% | 0.85% | 0.99% | 1.21% | 1.05% | 1.08% | 0.99% | 0.91% | 1.11% |
Financials
TR vs. GRC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. and The Gorman-Rupp Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TR vs. GRC - Profitability Comparison
TR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 49.77M and revenue of 151.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.8%.
GRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a gross profit of 57.36M and revenue of 176.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.
TR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.21M and revenue of 151.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.
GRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported an operating income of 27.48M and revenue of 176.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
TR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 17.66M and revenue of 151.54M, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
GRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a net income of 17.84M and revenue of 176.59M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TR and GRC have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRC has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to TR (10.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TR dropped -44.74% vs GRC's -67.23%.
GRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TR and GRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer