PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQQY vs. OOQB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQQY vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQY achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly higher than OOQB's -18.43% return.


TQQY

1D
0.11%
1M
5.38%
YTD
8.28%
6M
5.78%
1Y
19.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OOQB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-18.43%
6M
-24.99%
1Y
-27.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQY vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TQQY and OOQB is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025

0.60

The correlation between TQQY and OOQB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQQY vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQY
TQQY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

OOQB
OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQY vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQQYOOQBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.94

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

-0.51

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.53

-0.91

+3.44

TQQY vs. OOQB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQY Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the OOQB Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQY and OOQB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQQYOOQBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

-0.53

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

-0.41

+0.50

Drawdowns

TQQY vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQY drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, smaller than the maximum OOQB drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQY and OOQB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQQYOOQBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.31%

-53.44%

+28.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.35%

-53.44%

+34.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

-43.69%

+40.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-23.26%

+13.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.87%

30.11%

-22.24%

Volatility

TQQY vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) has a higher volatility of 1.90% compared to Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) at 0.00%. This indicates that TQQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOQB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQQYOOQBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.90%

0.00%

+1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.80%

39.39%

-24.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.92%

51.57%

-30.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.91%

58.12%

-34.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.91%

58.12%

-34.21%

TQQY vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQQY vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison

TQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.51%, more than OOQB's 11.62% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TQQY and OOQB have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQY has higher volatility (1.90%) compared to OOQB (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQY dropped -25.31% vs OOQB's -53.44%.

On 1-year performance, TQQY leads with 19.85% vs -27.35% for OOQB. On fees, OOQB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, OOQB has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TQQY has performed better with a 19.85% return vs -27.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OOQB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TQQY.

TQQY has the higher dividend yield at 59.51%, compared with 11.62% for OOQB.

TQQY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TQQY and 0.75% for OOQB.

TQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQQY and OOQB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer