TQQY vs. TQQQ
TQQY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TQQY is actively managed, while TQQQ is passively managed. Over the past year, TQQY returned 20.68% vs 145.30% for TQQQ. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TQQY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
TQQY vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQQY achieves a 8.16% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 65.71% return.
TQQY
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 8.16%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- 1Y
- 20.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 33.57%
- YTD
- 65.71%
- 6M
- 58.23%
- 1Y
- 145.30%
- 3Y*
- 69.92%
- 5Y*
- 29.86%
- 10Y*
- 45.44%
TQQY vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF | 8.16% | -5.07% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 65.71% | 36.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between TQQY and TQQQ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025 | 0.85 |
The correlation between TQQY and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TQQY vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
TQQY
TQQQ
TQQY vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TQQY | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 3.07 | -2.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 3.19 | -1.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.42 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 4.08 | -2.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.78 | 13.38 | -10.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TQQY | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 3.07 | -2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.74 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
TQQY vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQQY drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQY and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQQY | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.31% | -81.66% | +56.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.35% | -36.97% | +17.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.38% | 0.00% | -3.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.65% | -18.53% | +8.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.87% | 11.28% | -3.41% |
Volatility
TQQY vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) is 1.89%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that TQQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TQQY | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.89% | 13.26% | -11.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.80% | 36.05% | -21.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.93% | 47.63% | -26.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 66.55% | -42.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 65.98% | -42.03% |
TQQY vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TQQY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TQQY vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
TQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.58%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.36% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF | 59.58% | 49.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TQQY and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to TQQY (1.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQY dropped -25.31% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 1-year performance, TQQQ leads with 145.30% vs 20.68% for TQQY. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TQQY has been the lower-risk option at 1.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 145.30% return vs 20.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TQQY.
TQQY has the higher dividend yield at 59.58%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TQQY and 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TQQY and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer