PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQQY vs. WDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQQY vs. WDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQY achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly lower than WDTE's 10.00% return.


TQQY

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.00%
6M
-0.21%
YTD
3.26%
1Y
7.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-2.10%

WDTE

1D
0.81%
1M
0.37%
6M
8.62%
YTD
10.00%
1Y
17.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.11K$108.69K$257.29K
$434.93K$533.63K$696.62K

TQQY vs. WDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TQQY and WDTE is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025

0.78

The correlation between TQQY and WDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQQY vs. WDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TQQY
TQQY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

WDTE
WDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
WDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TQQY vs. WDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TQQYWDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.27

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

2.05

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

8.97

-8.63

TQQY vs. WDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQY Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the WDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQY and WDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TQQY vs. WDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQY drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, which is greater than WDTE's maximum drawdown of -15.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQY and WDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQQYWDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.06%

-15.85%

-10.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.35%

-7.65%

-11.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.75%

-1.06%

-6.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

-1.83%

-7.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.32%

1.75%

+6.57%

Volatility

TQQY vs. WDTE - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) at 2.82%. This indicates that TQQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQQYWDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

2.82%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

9.30%

+3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.50%

11.24%

+10.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.10%

11.42%

+11.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.10%

11.42%

+11.68%

TQQY vs. WDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than WDTE's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQQY vs. WDTE - Dividend Comparison

TQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.01%, more than WDTE's 32.93% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
TQQY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF
60.49%49.61%0.00%0.00%
WDTE
Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
32.93%35.78%51.80%16.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


TQQY and WDTE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQY has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to WDTE (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQY dropped -26.06% vs WDTE's -15.85%.

On 1-year performance, WDTE leads with 17.26% vs 7.79% for TQQY. On fees, WDTE is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, WDTE has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WDTE has performed better with a 17.26% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WDTE is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TQQY.

TQQY has the higher dividend yield at 60.49%, compared with 32.93% for WDTE.

TQQY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while WDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TQQY and 1.01% for WDTE.

WDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQQY and WDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer