TQQQ vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ returned 43.95%/yr vs 18.53%/yr for SCHG. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

TQQQ vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 44.91% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 43.95%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 18.53% annualized return.

TQQQ

• 1D: 4.41%
• 1M: -0.01%
• YTD: 44.91%
• 6M: 37.12%
• 1Y: 106.99%
• 3Y*: 62.78%
• 5Y*: 24.89%
• 10Y*: 43.95%

SCHG

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.94%
• YTD: 3.75%
• 6M: 2.93%
• 1Y: 20.82%
• 3Y*: 24.03%
• 5Y*: 14.90%
• 10Y*: 18.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	44.91%	34.35%	58.27%	198.04%	-79.09%	82.98%	110.05%	133.84%	-19.79%	118.06%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	3.75%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and SCHG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010	0.96

The correlation between TQQQ and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

TQQQ vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TQQQ	SCHG
Technology	53.8%	46.3%
Communication Services	15.8%	16.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	12.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	1.7%
Healthcare	4.2%	7.7%
Industrials	2.8%	5.8%
Utilities	1.4%	0.4%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.4%
Energy	0.6%	0.8%
Financial Services	0.2%	6.7%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.5%

Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 63
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 60
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 59

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 36
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TQQQ	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	1.33	+0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	1.82	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.24	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	1.27	+1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.45	4.25	+5.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TQQQ vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQQ and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TQQQ	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	1.33	+0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.67	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.86	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.83	-0.12

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQQQ	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.66%	-34.59%	-47.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.97%	-16.41%	-20.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.04%	-23.39%	-34.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.66%	-34.59%	-47.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.66%	-34.59%	-47.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.55%	-4.25%	-8.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.52%	-5.20%	-13.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.36%	4.91%	+6.45%

Volatility

TQQQ vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a higher volatility of 20.84% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.52%. This indicates that TQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TQQQ	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.84%	4.52%	+16.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.54%	12.02%	+27.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.94%	15.77%	+34.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.84%	22.31%	+44.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.15%	21.58%	+44.57%

TQQQ vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

TQQQ vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.37%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.41%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TQQQ and SCHG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, TQQQ and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TQQQ or SCHG?

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.84%) compared to SCHG (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, TQQQ or SCHG?

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 43.95% vs 18.53% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TQQQ or SCHG?

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 43.95% return vs 18.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TQQQ or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TQQQ or SCHG?

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between TQQQ and SCHG?

TQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.