PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQQQ vs. EDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQQQ vs. EDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 47.28% return, which is significantly lower than EDC's 62.45% return. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ has outperformed EDC with an annualized return of 44.55%, while EDC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.38% annualized return.


TQQQ

1D
1.99%
1M
0.36%
YTD
47.28%
6M
47.23%
1Y
106.26%
3Y*
59.79%
5Y*
24.34%
10Y*
44.55%

EDC

1D
1.22%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
62.45%
6M
72.90%
1Y
137.10%
3Y*
43.12%
5Y*
-2.02%
10Y*
8.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ vs. EDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
47.28%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
62.45%94.58%-2.00%7.48%-60.25%-20.81%6.49%43.92%-49.87%138.61%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and EDC is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.67

The correlation between TQQQ and EDC shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (5 years) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TQQQ vs. EDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TQQQ
EDC

Technology

53.8%
32.7%

Communication Services

15.8%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
3.2%

Healthcare

4.2%
3.2%

Industrials

2.8%
7.3%

Utilities

1.4%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.1%
7.0%

Energy

0.6%
4.4%

Financial Services

0.2%
20.8%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.1%

Technology

TQQQ
53.8%
EDC
32.7%

Communication Services

TQQQ
15.8%
EDC
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TQQQ
12.3%
EDC
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

TQQQ
7.7%
EDC
3.2%

Healthcare

TQQQ
4.2%
EDC
3.2%

Industrials

TQQQ
2.8%
EDC
7.3%

Utilities

TQQQ
1.4%
EDC
2.2%

Basic Materials

TQQQ
1.1%
EDC
7.0%

Energy

TQQQ
0.6%
EDC
4.4%

Financial Services

TQQQ
0.2%
EDC
20.8%

Real Estate

TQQQ
0.1%
EDC
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. EDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

EDC
EDC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ vs. EDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TQQQEDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

3.63

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.26

12.25

-2.99

TQQQ vs. EDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the EDC Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQQ and EDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. EDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, smaller than the maximum EDC drawdown of -92.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and EDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQQQEDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.66%

-92.54%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.97%

-37.98%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

-49.48%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

-80.70%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

-87.01%

+5.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.12%

-65.52%

+54.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.51%

-65.35%

+46.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.52%

11.25%

+0.27%

Volatility

TQQQ vs. EDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) is 22.79%, while Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a volatility of 33.39%. This indicates that TQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQQQEDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.79%

33.39%

-10.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.26%

58.40%

-17.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.24%

64.72%

-13.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.02%

57.74%

+9.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.22%

61.12%

+5.10%

TQQQ vs. EDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than EDC's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQQQ vs. EDC - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than EDC's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
1.05%1.79%3.94%3.54%0.00%0.18%0.44%0.97%0.78%0.25%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.41%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


TQQQ and EDC have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDC has higher volatility (33.39%) compared to TQQQ (22.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs EDC's -92.54%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.55% vs 8.38% for EDC. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 22.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.55% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.

EDC has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.41% for TQQQ.

TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 1.33% for EDC.

EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQQQ and EDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer