PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQQQ vs. ^IXIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TQQQ vs. ^IXIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 38.79% return, which is significantly higher than ^IXIC's 10.62% return. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ has outperformed ^IXIC with an annualized return of 42.84%, while ^IXIC has yielded a comparatively lower 17.88% annualized return.


TQQQ

1D
-14.28%
1M
2.07%
YTD
38.79%
6M
30.51%
1Y
103.91%
3Y*
60.11%
5Y*
24.09%
10Y*
42.84%

^IXIC

1D
-4.18%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
10.62%
6M
9.04%
1Y
33.22%
3Y*
24.64%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*
17.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ vs. ^IXIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
38.79%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%
^IXIC
NASDAQ Composite
10.62%20.36%28.64%43.42%-33.10%21.39%43.64%35.23%-3.88%28.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and ^IXIC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.98

The correlation between TQQQ and ^IXIC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. ^IXIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

^IXIC
^IXIC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
^IXIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^IXIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
^IXIC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
^IXIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
^IXIC Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ vs. ^IXIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQQQ^IXICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

2.53

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

9.80

-0.60

TQQQ vs. ^IXIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQQ and ^IXIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQQQ^IXICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.99

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.59

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.81

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.52

+0.19

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. ^IXIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, roughly equal to the maximum ^IXIC drawdown of -77.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and ^IXIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQQQ^IXICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.66%

-77.93%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.97%

-13.21%

-23.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

-24.32%

-33.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

-36.40%

-45.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

-36.40%

-45.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.25%

-5.11%

-11.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-21.40%

+2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.33%

3.40%

+7.93%

Volatility

TQQQ vs. ^IXIC - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a higher volatility of 20.42% compared to NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) at 5.87%. This indicates that TQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^IXIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQQQ^IXICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.42%

5.87%

+14.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.33%

12.89%

+26.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.81%

16.80%

+33.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.79%

22.50%

+44.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.11%

22.05%

+44.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, TQQQ and ^IXIC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.42%) compared to ^IXIC (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs ^IXIC's -77.93%.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQQQ and ^IXIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer