PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPZ vs. GII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPZ vs. GII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPZ achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly lower than GII's 9.73% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TPZ having a 8.30% annualized return and GII not far behind at 8.08%.


TPZ

1D
-0.44%
1M
-1.48%
6M
3.90%
YTD
6.91%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
8.30%
ALL TIME*
7.92%

GII

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.31%
6M
3.82%
YTD
9.73%
1Y
13.93%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
8.08%
ALL TIME*
5.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.91M$4.19M$4.14M
$293.05K$219.78K$220.84K

TPZ vs. GII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPZ
Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF
6.91%5.67%53.88%20.72%2.44%29.31%-27.84%15.61%-16.12%-0.30%
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
9.73%21.79%14.30%5.90%-0.54%11.39%-6.81%26.32%-10.08%19.07%

Correlation

The correlation between TPZ and GII is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2009

0.46

Over the past year, TPZ and GII have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.

TPZ vs. GII - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPZ
GII

Energy

51.8%
21.6%

Utilities

43.6%
27.3%

Industrials

4.6%
22.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.7%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

4.4%

Energy

TPZ
51.8%
GII
21.6%

Utilities

TPZ
43.6%
GII
27.3%

Industrials

TPZ
4.6%
GII
22.9%

Basic Materials

TPZ

-

GII

-

Communication Services

TPZ

-

GII
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

TPZ

-

GII

-

Consumer Defensive

TPZ

-

GII

-

Financial Services

TPZ

-

GII
4.7%

Healthcare

TPZ

-

GII

-

Real Estate

TPZ

-

GII
0.1%

Technology

TPZ

-

GII
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPZ vs. GII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPZ
TPZ Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

GII
GII Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GII Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
GII Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPZ vs. GII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPZGIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.23

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

2.35

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.38

6.30

-4.91

TPZ vs. GII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the GII Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPZ and GII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPZ vs. GII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPZ drawdown since its inception was -78.17%, which is greater than GII's maximum drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPZ and GII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPZGIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.17%

-50.98%

-27.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-5.94%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.78%

-11.38%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.78%

-20.67%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.04%

-42.84%

-34.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.57%

-2.78%

-2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.85%

-11.44%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.22%

+0.77%

Volatility

TPZ vs. GII - Volatility Comparison

Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) at 2.27%. This indicates that TPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPZGIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

2.27%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.20%

9.11%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.15%

10.99%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.67%

14.06%

+3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.73%

17.03%

+10.70%

TPZ vs. GII - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GII's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPZ vs. GII - Dividend Comparison

TPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than GII's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
2.67%3.17%3.23%3.70%3.07%2.37%2.66%3.39%3.31%3.38%3.11%3.54%
TPZ
Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF
3.49%3.99%5.88%8.99%9.52%4.77%8.80%8.84%9.41%7.28%6.88%9.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPZ and GII have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPZ has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to GII (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPZ dropped -78.17% vs GII's -50.98%.

On 10-year performance, TPZ leads with 8.30% vs 8.08% for GII. On fees, GII is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GII has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TPZ has performed better with a 8.30% return vs 8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GII is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TPZ.

TPZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.67% for GII.

They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TPZ and 0.40% for GII.

GII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPZ and GII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer