PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPZ vs. IXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPZ vs. IXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPZ achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 33.87% return. Over the past 10 years, TPZ has underperformed IXC with an annualized return of 8.10%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.49% annualized return.


TPZ

1D
-1.77%
1M
-4.44%
6M
2.30%
YTD
5.71%
1Y
5.53%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*
8.10%
ALL TIME*
7.86%

IXC

1D
0.97%
1M
12.72%
6M
18.49%
YTD
33.87%
1Y
41.65%
3Y*
16.06%
5Y*
22.19%
10Y*
10.49%
ALL TIME*
8.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$37.01M$61.31M$57.85M
$241.49K$219.20K$228.47K

TPZ vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPZ
Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF
5.71%5.67%53.88%20.72%2.44%29.31%-27.84%15.61%-16.12%-0.30%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
33.87%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-14.85%5.54%

Correlation

The correlation between TPZ and IXC is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2009

0.53

The correlation between TPZ and IXC shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TPZ vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPZ
IXC

Energy

51.8%
99.5%

Utilities

43.6%
0.2%

Industrials

4.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

TPZ
51.8%
IXC
99.5%

Utilities

TPZ
43.6%
IXC
0.2%

Industrials

TPZ
4.6%
IXC

-

Basic Materials

TPZ

-

IXC

-

Communication Services

TPZ

-

IXC

-

Consumer Cyclical

TPZ

-

IXC

-

Consumer Defensive

TPZ

-

IXC

-

Financial Services

TPZ

-

IXC

-

Healthcare

TPZ

-

IXC

-

Real Estate

TPZ

-

IXC

-

Technology

TPZ

-

IXC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPZ vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPZ
TPZ Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPZ vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPZIXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.35

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

2.72

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.90

8.44

-6.54

TPZ vs. IXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the IXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPZ and IXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPZ vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPZ drawdown since its inception was -78.17%, which is greater than IXC's maximum drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPZ and IXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPZIXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.17%

-67.88%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-15.36%

+8.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.78%

-19.06%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.78%

-24.93%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.04%

-64.16%

-12.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.63%

-3.66%

-2.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.86%

-17.43%

+5.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

4.95%

-2.03%

Volatility

TPZ vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) is 5.00%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that TPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPZIXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

6.29%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

16.07%

-4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.14%

19.67%

-5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.67%

23.37%

-5.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.73%

26.83%

+0.90%

TPZ vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPZ vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison

TPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than IXC's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
2.84%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%
TPZ
Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF
3.53%3.99%5.88%8.99%9.52%4.77%8.80%8.84%9.41%7.28%6.88%9.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPZ and IXC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXC has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to TPZ (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPZ dropped -78.17% vs IXC's -67.88%.

On 10-year performance, IXC leads with 10.49% vs 8.10% for TPZ. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXC has performed better with a 10.49% return vs 8.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TPZ.

TPZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 2.84% for IXC.

TPZ is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TPZ and 0.40% for IXC.

IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPZ and IXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer