TPZ vs. TMLP
TPZ (Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF) and TMLP (Tortoise MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPZ is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by Tortoise, while TMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Tortoise MLP Index. TPZ is actively managed, while TMLP is passively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TPZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TMLP.
Performance
TPZ vs. TMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPZ achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly lower than TMLP's 21.62% return.
TPZ
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- 6M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 18.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.92%
TMLP
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 6.21%
- 6M
- 13.82%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
TMLP Tortoise MLP ETF | $19.84K | $25.22K | $94.27K |
| $293.05K | $219.78K | $220.84K |
TPZ vs. TMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF | 6.91% | 0.23% |
TMLP Tortoise MLP ETF | 21.62% | 0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPZ and TMLP is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPZ vs. TMLP — Risk / Return Rank
TPZ
TMLP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TPZ vs. TMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) and Tortoise MLP ETF (TMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPZ | TMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPZ vs. TMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPZ drawdown since its inception was -78.17%, which is greater than TMLP's maximum drawdown of -8.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPZ and TMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPZ | TMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.17% | -8.55% | -69.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.57% | -0.90% | -4.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.85% | -2.14% | -9.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | — | — |
Volatility
TPZ vs. TMLP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPZ | TMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.15% | 14.23% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 14.23% | +3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 14.23% | +13.50% |
TPZ vs. TMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TMLP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPZ vs. TMLP - Dividend Comparison
TPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than TMLP's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMLP Tortoise MLP ETF | 3.68% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF | 3.49% | 3.99% | 5.88% | 8.99% | 9.52% | 4.77% | 8.80% | 8.84% | 9.41% | 7.28% | 6.88% | 9.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPZ and TMLP have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMLP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMLP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TPZ.
TMLP has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 3.49% for TPZ.
TPZ is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while TMLP is MLPs. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TPZ and 0.50% for TMLP.
Find the right allocation for TPZ and TMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer