TPYP vs. PXJ
TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) and PXJ (Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - TPYP tracks the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index while PXJ tracks the Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TPYP returned 11.93%/yr vs -0.80%/yr for PXJ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPYP charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for PXJ.
Performance
TPYP vs. PXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPYP achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly lower than PXJ's 46.18% return. Over the past 10 years, TPYP has outperformed PXJ with an annualized return of 11.93%, while PXJ has yielded a comparatively lower -0.80% annualized return.
TPYP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- 20.07%
- 6M
- 19.62%
- 1Y
- 21.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.01%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
PXJ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- 46.18%
- 6M
- 38.54%
- 1Y
- 82.76%
- 3Y*
- 24.79%
- 5Y*
- 17.27%
- 10Y*
- -0.80%
TPYP vs. PXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 20.07% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 10.51% | 16.09% | 34.97% | -20.99% | 23.35% | -11.13% | 2.27% |
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF | 46.18% | 8.74% | 0.21% | 14.44% | 62.25% | 11.28% | -44.31% | -0.32% | -39.82% | -23.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPYP and PXJ is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TPYP and PXJ has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
TPYP vs. PXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TPYP
PXJ
Energy
Utilities
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
TPYP
PXJ
Utilities
TPYP
PXJ
Financial Services
TPYP
PXJ
Basic Materials
TPYP
PXJ
-
Communication Services
TPYP
-
PXJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
TPYP
-
PXJ
-
Consumer Defensive
TPYP
-
PXJ
-
Healthcare
TPYP
-
PXJ
-
Industrials
TPYP
-
PXJ
Real Estate
TPYP
-
PXJ
-
Technology
TPYP
-
PXJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPYP vs. PXJ — Risk / Return Rank
TPYP
PXJ
TPYP vs. PXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPYP | PXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.48 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 8.24 | -5.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | 23.98 | -15.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPYP | PXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 3.17 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.50 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | -0.02 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | -0.05 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
TPYP vs. PXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPYP drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, smaller than the maximum PXJ drawdown of -94.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPYP and PXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPYP | PXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.91% | -94.82% | +42.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | -10.10% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.17% | -40.03% | +26.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.96% | -40.03% | +22.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.91% | -87.72% | +35.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.27% | -66.60% | +61.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -55.67% | +47.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 3.46% | -0.90% |
Volatility
TPYP vs. PXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) is 5.67%, while Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that TPYP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPYP | PXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 7.75% | -2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 18.30% | -8.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 26.41% | -13.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 34.57% | -17.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 39.47% | -17.53% |
TPYP vs. PXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPYP has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PXJ's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPYP vs. PXJ - Dividend Comparison
TPYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than PXJ's 2.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF | 2.21% | 2.91% | 3.34% | 1.99% | 0.65% | 2.40% | 4.72% | 1.87% | 0.99% | 2.75% | 1.18% | 2.36% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.25% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPYP and PXJ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXJ has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to TPYP (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPYP dropped -51.91% vs PXJ's -94.82%.
On 10-year performance, TPYP leads with 11.93% vs -0.80% for PXJ. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 11.93% return vs -0.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXJ.
TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 2.21% for PXJ.
TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index, while PXJ tracks Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TPYP and 0.63% for PXJ.
PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPYP and PXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer