TPYP vs. POW
TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPYP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. TPYP is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. TPYP charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
TPYP vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPYP achieves a 24.84% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.
TPYP
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 26.21%
- YTD
- 24.84%
- 1Y
- 28.43%
- 3Y*
- 25.46%
- 5Y*
- 19.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
POW
- 1D
- -3.60%
- 1M
- -8.76%
- 6M
- 31.71%
- YTD
- 38.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPYP vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 24.84% | 2.42% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 38.93% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPYP and POW is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPYP vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
TPYP
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TPYP vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPYP | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.99 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPYP vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPYP drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPYP and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPYP | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.91% | -18.37% | -33.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -18.37% | +16.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -4.33% | -3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | — | — |
Volatility
TPYP vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPYP | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.74% | 32.94% | -19.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 32.94% | -15.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 32.94% | -11.04% |
TPYP vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPYP has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPYP vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
TPYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.16% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPYP and POW have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.16%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
TPYP is categorized as Energy Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TPYP and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for TPYP and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer