PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPLC vs. PAMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPLC vs. PAMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPLC achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly lower than PAMC's 17.95% return.


TPLC

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.66%
YTD
8.78%
6M
7.78%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*

PAMC

1D
0.20%
1M
5.18%
YTD
17.95%
6M
18.02%
1Y
28.44%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPLC vs. PAMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
8.78%7.08%13.10%15.17%-12.58%26.34%26.75%
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
17.95%1.54%26.20%19.30%-12.15%13.15%34.03%

Correlation

The correlation between TPLC and PAMC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020

0.89

The correlation between TPLC and PAMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

TPLC vs. PAMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPLC
PAMC

Industrials

23.2%
25.6%

Technology

16.7%
14.1%

Financial Services

11.8%
16.5%

Utilities

11.6%
3.1%

Healthcare

9.3%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
12.1%

Energy

8.2%
10.8%

Basic Materials

5.9%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
4.2%

Real Estate

0.3%
4.1%

Communication Services

0.2%
0.8%

Industrials

TPLC
23.2%
PAMC
25.6%

Technology

TPLC
16.7%
PAMC
14.1%

Financial Services

TPLC
11.8%
PAMC
16.5%

Utilities

TPLC
11.6%
PAMC
3.1%

Healthcare

TPLC
9.3%
PAMC
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TPLC
9.0%
PAMC
12.1%

Energy

TPLC
8.2%
PAMC
10.8%

Basic Materials

TPLC
5.9%
PAMC
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

TPLC
3.8%
PAMC
4.2%

Real Estate

TPLC
0.3%
PAMC
4.1%

Communication Services

TPLC
0.2%
PAMC
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPLC vs. PAMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPLC
TPLC Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TPLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPLC Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
TPLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPLC Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

PAMC
PAMC Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PAMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PAMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPLC vs. PAMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPLCPAMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.29

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

2.79

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

10.32

-4.38

TPLC vs. PAMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the PAMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPLC and PAMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPLCPAMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

1.55

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.42

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.77

-0.21

Drawdowns

TPLC vs. PAMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPLC drawdown since its inception was -38.02%, which is greater than PAMC's maximum drawdown of -27.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLC and PAMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPLCPAMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.02%

-27.04%

-10.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-10.24%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.18%

-26.07%

+7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.63%

-27.04%

+5.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.29%

-7.47%

+2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.76%

-0.63%

Volatility

TPLC vs. PAMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) is 2.70%, while Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that TPLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPLCPAMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

5.65%

-2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.45%

14.17%

-5.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.50%

18.44%

-6.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

20.40%

-4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.89%

20.73%

-0.84%

TPLC vs. PAMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPLC has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than PAMC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPLC vs. PAMC - Dividend Comparison

TPLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than PAMC's 1.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
1.10%1.11%0.97%0.69%1.29%0.36%0.30%0.00%
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
0.84%0.89%0.88%0.89%1.06%0.61%0.81%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPLC and PAMC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAMC has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to TPLC (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLC dropped -38.02% vs PAMC's -27.04%.

On 5-year performance, PAMC leads with 8.58% vs 8.22% for TPLC. On fees, TPLC is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, TPLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PAMC has performed better with a 8.58% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TPLC is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PAMC.

PAMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.84% for TPLC.

TPLC tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while PAMC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TPLC and 0.60% for PAMC.

PAMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPLC and PAMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer