TPLC vs. PAMC
TPLC (Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund) and PAMC (Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - TPLC tracks the Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index while PAMC tracks the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TPLC returned 8.22%/yr vs 8.58%/yr for PAMC. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPLC charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PAMC.
Performance
TPLC vs. PAMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPLC achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly lower than PAMC's 17.95% return.
TPLC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 12.59%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- —
PAMC
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 17.95%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- 1Y
- 28.44%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
TPLC vs. PAMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund | 8.78% | 7.08% | 13.10% | 15.17% | -12.58% | 26.34% | 26.75% |
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 17.95% | 1.54% | 26.20% | 19.30% | -12.15% | 13.15% | 34.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPLC and PAMC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between TPLC and PAMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
TPLC vs. PAMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TPLC
PAMC
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Industrials
TPLC
PAMC
Technology
TPLC
PAMC
Financial Services
TPLC
PAMC
Utilities
TPLC
PAMC
Healthcare
TPLC
PAMC
Consumer Cyclical
TPLC
PAMC
Energy
TPLC
PAMC
Basic Materials
TPLC
PAMC
Consumer Defensive
TPLC
PAMC
Real Estate
TPLC
PAMC
Communication Services
TPLC
PAMC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPLC vs. PAMC — Risk / Return Rank
TPLC
PAMC
TPLC vs. PAMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPLC | PAMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.29 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 2.79 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | 10.32 | -4.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPLC | PAMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.55 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.42 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.77 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
TPLC vs. PAMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPLC drawdown since its inception was -38.02%, which is greater than PAMC's maximum drawdown of -27.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLC and PAMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPLC | PAMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.02% | -27.04% | -10.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -10.24% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.18% | -26.07% | +7.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.63% | -27.04% | +5.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | 0.00% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.29% | -7.47% | +2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.76% | -0.63% |
Volatility
TPLC vs. PAMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) is 2.70%, while Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that TPLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPLC | PAMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 5.65% | -2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.45% | 14.17% | -5.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 18.44% | -6.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 20.40% | -4.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 20.73% | -0.84% |
TPLC vs. PAMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPLC has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than PAMC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPLC vs. PAMC - Dividend Comparison
TPLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than PAMC's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.10% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.00% |
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund | 0.84% | 0.89% | 0.88% | 0.89% | 1.06% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPLC and PAMC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAMC has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to TPLC (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLC dropped -38.02% vs PAMC's -27.04%.
On 5-year performance, PAMC leads with 8.58% vs 8.22% for TPLC. On fees, TPLC is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, TPLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAMC has performed better with a 8.58% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPLC is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PAMC.
PAMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.84% for TPLC.
TPLC tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while PAMC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TPLC and 0.60% for PAMC.
PAMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPLC and PAMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer