TPFG vs. SPYG
TPFG (Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPFG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Victory Free Cash Flow Growth BRI Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPFG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
TPFG vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TPFG
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -4.90%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 1Y
- 25.32%
- 3Y*
- 25.72%
- 5Y*
- 14.24%
- 10Y*
- 17.77%
TPFG vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TPFG Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | 1.96% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 6.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPFG and SPYG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPFG vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
TPFG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPYG
TPFG vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (TPFG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPFG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPFG vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPFG drawdown since its inception was -8.66%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPFG and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPFG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -67.63% | +58.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.10% | -2.02% | -5.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -24.23% | +21.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.59% | — |
Volatility
TPFG vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPFG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.74% | 17.48% | +15.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.74% | 21.42% | +11.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.74% | 20.73% | +12.01% |
TPFG vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPFG vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
TPFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
TPFG Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPFG and SPYG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TPFG.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for TPFG.
TPFG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. TPFG tracks Victory Free Cash Flow Growth BRI Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TPFG and 0.04% for SPYG.
Find the right allocation for TPFG and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer