TPFG vs. SPXM
TPFG (Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. TPFG is passively managed, while SPXM is actively managed. TPFG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
TPFG vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TPFG
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -6.77%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 8.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPFG vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TPFG Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | -0.76% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPFG vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank
TPFG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPXM
TPFG vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (TPFG) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPFG | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPFG vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPFG drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPFG and SPXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPFG | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -5.08% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.58% | -0.75% | -8.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -0.78% | -2.08% |
Volatility
TPFG vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPFG | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.98% | 7.65% | +25.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.98% | 7.59% | +25.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.98% | 7.59% | +25.39% |
TPFG vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPFG vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
TPFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% |
TPFG Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TPFG.
SPXM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for TPFG.
They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TPFG and 0.47% for SPXM.
Find the right allocation for TPFG and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer