TPFG vs. CCOR

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

TPFG (Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPFG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Victory Free Cash Flow Growth BRI Index, while CCOR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Core Alternative. TPFG is passively managed, while CCOR is actively managed. Their -0.59 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TPFG charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

TPFG vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (TPFG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TPFG

• 1D: 2.69%
• 1M: -0.14%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CCOR

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 1.50%
• 6M: -2.63%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 1Y: 0.01%
• 3Y*: -0.96%
• 5Y*: -1.46%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	$61.50K	$56.93K	$78.52K
TPFG Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF	$342.29K	$184.68K	$526.09K

TPFG vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TPFG Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF	3.27%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	2.62%

Correlation

The correlation between TPFG and CCOR is -0.59, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026	-0.59

Return for Risk

TPFG vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPFG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 10
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPFG vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (TPFG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPFG	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.00	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.06	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.01	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.00	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.00	—

Drawdowns

TPFG vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPFG drawdown since its inception was -13.31%, smaller than the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPFG and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPFG	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.31%	-22.99%	+9.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.79%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.91%	-15.78%	+9.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-7.47%	+3.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TPFG	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.68%	8.23%	+23.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.68%	11.19%	+20.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.68%	10.77%	+20.91%

TPFG vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPFG vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

TPFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	0.98%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%
TPFG Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPFG and CCOR in my portfolio?

TPFG and CCOR have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TPFG or CCOR?

On fees, TPFG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TPFG or CCOR?

TPFG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TPFG or CCOR?

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for TPFG.

What is the main difference between TPFG and CCOR?

TPFG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CCOR is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Core Alternative. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TPFG and 1.09% for CCOR.