TPE.TO vs. GSID
TPE.TO (TD International Equity Index ETF) and GSID (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPE.TO is a International Equity fund tracking the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index (CA NTR), while GSID is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TPE.TO returned 11.09%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for GSID. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPE.TO charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for GSID.
Performance
TPE.TO vs. GSID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TPE.TO is traded in CAD, while GSID is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GSID values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TPE.TO having a 9.84% return and GSID slightly higher at 10.21%.
TPE.TO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 5.26%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
GSID
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 10.21%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 23.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.97%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- —
TPE.TO vs. GSID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPE.TO TD International Equity Index ETF | 9.84% | 25.30% | 12.36% | 15.65% | -9.18% | 10.41% | 22.72% |
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 10.21% | 25.73% | 12.50% | 15.04% | -8.69% | 9.67% | 22.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPE.TO and GSID is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020 | 0.85 |
The correlation between TPE.TO and GSID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
TPE.TO vs. GSID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TPE.TO
GSID
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
TPE.TO
GSID
Industrials
TPE.TO
GSID
Technology
TPE.TO
GSID
Healthcare
TPE.TO
GSID
Consumer Cyclical
TPE.TO
GSID
Consumer Defensive
TPE.TO
GSID
Basic Materials
TPE.TO
GSID
Communication Services
TPE.TO
GSID
Energy
TPE.TO
GSID
Utilities
TPE.TO
GSID
Real Estate
TPE.TO
GSID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPE.TO vs. GSID — Risk / Return Rank
TPE.TO
GSID
TPE.TO vs. GSID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD International Equity Index ETF (TPE.TO) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPE.TO | GSID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 2.14 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 8.40 | -0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPE.TO | GSID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.68 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.84 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.05 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
TPE.TO vs. GSID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPE.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.42%, which is greater than GSID's maximum drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPE.TO and GSID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPE.TO | GSID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.42% | -23.91% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | -11.05% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.41% | -14.33% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.81% | -23.91% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -0.29% | -3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -4.04% | -0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 2.81% | +0.12% |
Volatility
TPE.TO vs. GSID - Volatility Comparison
TD International Equity Index ETF (TPE.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) at 4.60%. This indicates that TPE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPE.TO | GSID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 4.60% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | 11.87% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.90% | 14.15% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 13.46% | +0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 13.38% | +1.52% |
TPE.TO vs. GSID - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPE.TO has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GSID's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TPE.TO vs. GSID - Dividend Comparison
TPE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than GSID's 2.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 2.43% | 2.64% | 2.90% | 2.59% | 2.57% | 2.93% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPE.TO TD International Equity Index ETF | 2.13% | 2.30% | 2.37% | 2.66% | 2.89% | 2.41% | 2.42% | 2.60% | 2.94% | 2.35% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPE.TO and GSID have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TPE.TO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TPE.TO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GSID.
TPE.TO is categorized as International Equity, while GSID is Foreign Large Cap Equities. TPE.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index (CA NTR), while GSID tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: TD and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TPE.TO and 0.20% for GSID.
Find the right allocation for TPE.TO and GSID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer