TOT vs. CLSE

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

TOT (LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF) and CLSE (Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOT is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by LionShares, while CLSE is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Convergence Investment Partners. Both are actively managed. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TOT charges 0.07%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for CLSE.

Performance

TOT vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TOT

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: -1.80%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CLSE

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -1.88%
• 6M: 18.34%
• YTD: 22.28%
• 1Y: 41.83%
• 3Y*: 29.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	$14.56M	$11.58M	$9.63M
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF	$11.96K	$10.63K	$29.27K

TOT vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF	-2.08%
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TOT and CLSE is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	0.58

Return for Risk

TOT vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TOT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLSE

CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TOT vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TOT	CLSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.06	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.19	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.53	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	8.67	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	29.31	—

Drawdowns

TOT vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOT drawdown since its inception was -4.26%, smaller than the maximum CLSE drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOT and CLSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOT	CLSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-16.45%	+12.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.85%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-2.99%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.48%	-3.52%	+2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.43%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TOT	CLSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.32%	13.73%	-0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.32%	13.86%	-0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	13.86%	-0.54%

TOT vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOT has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSE's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOT vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

TOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	0.78%	0.95%	0.93%	1.21%	0.85%
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOT and CLSE in my portfolio?

TOT and CLSE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TOT or CLSE?

On fees, TOT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOT or CLSE?

TOT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CLSE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOT or CLSE?

CLSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for TOT.

What is the main difference between TOT and CLSE?

TOT is categorized as Actively Managed, while CLSE is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: LionShares and Convergence Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for TOT and 1.52% for CLSE.