TOT vs. BLST

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

TOT (LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF) and BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOT is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by LionShares, while BLST is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Bluemonte. Both are actively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TOT charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BLST.

Performance

TOT vs. BLST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TOT

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: -1.80%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

BLST

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -0.54%
• 6M: 0.13%
• YTD: 0.23%
• 1Y: 2.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	$246.66K	$341.10K	$409.30K
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF	$11.96K	$10.63K	$29.27K

TOT vs. BLST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF	-2.08%
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	0.23%

Correlation

The correlation between TOT and BLST is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	0.49

Return for Risk

TOT vs. BLST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TOT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLST

BLST Risk / Return Rank: 49
BLST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BLST Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BLST Omega Ratio Rank: 49
BLST Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
BLST Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TOT vs. BLST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TOT	BLST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.21	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.80	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.61	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.51	—

Drawdowns

TOT vs. BLST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOT drawdown since its inception was -4.26%, which is greater than BLST's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOT and BLST.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOT	BLST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-1.69%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-0.94%	-2.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.48%	-0.41%	-1.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.60%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TOT	BLST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.32%	2.26%	+11.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.32%	2.26%	+11.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	2.26%	+11.06%

TOT vs. BLST - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOT has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BLST's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TOT vs. BLST - Dividend Comparison

TOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%.

Position	TTM	2025
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	3.79%	2.11%
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOT and BLST in my portfolio?

TOT and BLST have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TOT or BLST?

On fees, TOT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOT or BLST?

TOT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BLST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOT or BLST?

BLST has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 0.00% for TOT.

What is the main difference between TOT and BLST?

TOT is categorized as Actively Managed, while BLST is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: LionShares and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for TOT and 0.23% for BLST.