TOPW vs. IWMI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

TOPW (Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF) and IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. TOPW is passively managed, while IWMI is actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TOPW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for IWMI.

Performance

TOPW vs. IWMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOPW achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly lower than IWMI's 17.17% return.

TOPW

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 0.77%
• 6M: 0.41%
• YTD: 2.38%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWMI

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.67%
• 6M: 11.59%
• YTD: 17.17%
• 1Y: 32.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOPW vs. IWMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF	2.38%	-1.33%
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	17.17%	7.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TOPW and IWMI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025	0.61

Return for Risk

TOPW vs. IWMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOPW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IWMI

IWMI Risk / Return Rank: 85
IWMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
IWMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
IWMI Omega Ratio Rank: 80
IWMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
IWMI Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOPW vs. IWMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TOPW	IWMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.13	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.99	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.37	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.87	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.93	—

Drawdowns

TOPW vs. IWMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOPW drawdown since its inception was -29.87%, which is greater than IWMI's maximum drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOPW and IWMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOPW	IWMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.87%	-23.88%	-5.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.47%	-0.82%	-13.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.31%	-3.92%	-9.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TOPW	IWMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.17%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.42%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.51%	15.28%	+12.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.51%	17.74%	+9.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.51%	17.74%	+9.77%

TOPW vs. IWMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOPW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOPW vs. IWMI - Dividend Comparison

TOPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.21%, more than IWMI's 13.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	13.37%	14.05%	8.78%
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF	48.21%	21.52%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOPW and IWMI in my portfolio?

TOPW and IWMI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TOPW or IWMI?

On fees, IWMI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOPW or IWMI?

IWMI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TOPW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOPW or IWMI?

TOPW has the higher dividend yield at 48.21%, compared with 13.37% for IWMI.

What is the main difference between TOPW and IWMI?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TOPW and 0.68% for IWMI.