TOLZ vs. WARP
TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) and WARP (VanEck Space ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - TOLZ tracks the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index while WARP tracks the MarketVector Space Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TOLZ charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WARP.
Performance
TOLZ vs. WARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TOLZ
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -3.18%
- YTD
- 11.11%
- 6M
- 12.03%
- 1Y
- 16.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 7.84%
WARP
- 1D
- -6.61%
- 1M
- -29.11%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOLZ vs. WARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | -1.62% |
WARP VanEck Space ETF | -7.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOLZ and WARP is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOLZ vs. WARP — Risk / Return Rank
TOLZ
WARP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TOLZ vs. WARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and VanEck Space ETF (WARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOLZ | WARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOLZ vs. WARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, which is greater than WARP's maximum drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and WARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOLZ | WARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -37.43% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | -37.43% | +34.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -12.70% | +6.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | — | — |
Volatility
TOLZ vs. WARP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOLZ | WARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 90.52% | -80.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 90.52% | -76.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 90.52% | -74.26% |
TOLZ vs. WARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than WARP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOLZ vs. WARP - Dividend Comparison
TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, while WARP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.67% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
WARP VanEck Space ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOLZ and WARP have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WARP.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.00% for WARP.
TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while WARP tracks MarketVector Space Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.50% for WARP.
Find the right allocation for TOLZ and WARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer