TOK vs. ILCB
TOK (iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF) and ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from iShares - TOK tracks the MSCI Kokusai Index while ILCB tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TOK returned 13.60%/yr vs 15.00%/yr for ILCB. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TOK charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ILCB.
Performance
TOK vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOK achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 11.12% return. Over the past 10 years, TOK has underperformed ILCB with an annualized return of 13.60%, while ILCB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.00% annualized return.
TOK
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 10.43%
- 1Y
- 25.70%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
ILCB
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 28.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.45%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
TOK vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOK iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF | 9.75% | 20.83% | 19.52% | 24.76% | -17.93% | 23.84% | 15.06% | 30.05% | -7.83% | 22.09% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 11.12% | 17.70% | 24.96% | 26.91% | -19.48% | 24.07% | 19.40% | 32.68% | -8.51% | 22.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOK and ILCB is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007 | 0.82 |
The correlation between TOK and ILCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.97 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TOK vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOK
ILCB
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
TOK
ILCB
Financial Services
TOK
ILCB
Industrials
TOK
ILCB
Communication Services
TOK
ILCB
Consumer Cyclical
TOK
ILCB
Healthcare
TOK
ILCB
Consumer Defensive
TOK
ILCB
Energy
TOK
ILCB
Basic Materials
TOK
ILCB
Utilities
TOK
ILCB
Real Estate
TOK
ILCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOK vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank
TOK
ILCB
TOK vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOK | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.16 | 2.35 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.03 | 3.20 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.42 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 3.10 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.07 | 14.24 | -1.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOK | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.35 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.79 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.83 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.64 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
TOK vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOK drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, which is greater than ILCB's maximum drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOK and ILCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOK | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.18% | -51.53% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.07% | -9.09% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.23% | -19.05% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.86% | -25.47% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.82% | -35.30% | +0.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.67% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.52% | -6.24% | -2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.97% | 0.00% |
Volatility
TOK vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) at 2.88%. This indicates that TOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOK | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 2.88% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.36% | 9.10% | +0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.94% | 12.02% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 17.13% | -1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 18.16% | -1.01% |
TOK vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TOK vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison
TOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than ILCB's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
TOK iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF | 1.25% | 1.37% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 3.55% | 1.66% | 1.52% | 2.12% | 2.74% | 2.60% | 2.56% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, TOK and ILCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TOK has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to ILCB (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOK dropped -56.18% vs ILCB's -51.53%.
On 10-year performance, ILCB leads with 15.00% vs 13.60% for TOK. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 15.00% return vs 13.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TOK.
TOK has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.97% for ILCB.
TOK tracks MSCI Kokusai Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TOK and 0.03% for ILCB.
ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOK and ILCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer