PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOK vs. ILCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOK vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOK achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 11.12% return. Over the past 10 years, TOK has underperformed ILCB with an annualized return of 13.60%, while ILCB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.00% annualized return.


TOK

1D
-0.80%
1M
4.53%
YTD
9.75%
6M
10.43%
1Y
25.70%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
12.18%
10Y*
13.60%

ILCB

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.29%
YTD
11.12%
6M
11.10%
1Y
28.03%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
15.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOK vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
9.75%20.83%19.52%24.76%-17.93%23.84%15.06%30.05%-7.83%22.09%
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
11.12%17.70%24.96%26.91%-19.48%24.07%19.40%32.68%-8.51%22.09%

Correlation

The correlation between TOK and ILCB is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007

0.82

The correlation between TOK and ILCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.97 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TOK vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TOK
ILCB

Technology

31.3%
35.5%

Financial Services

14.9%
11.7%

Industrials

9.8%
8.6%

Communication Services

9.0%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.7%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
4.8%

Energy

4.0%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.2%
1.8%

Utilities

2.8%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.8%

Technology

TOK
31.3%
ILCB
35.5%

Financial Services

TOK
14.9%
ILCB
11.7%

Industrials

TOK
9.8%
ILCB
8.6%

Communication Services

TOK
9.0%
ILCB
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TOK
9.0%
ILCB
10.1%

Healthcare

TOK
8.7%
ILCB
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

TOK
5.2%
ILCB
4.8%

Energy

TOK
4.0%
ILCB
3.5%

Basic Materials

TOK
3.2%
ILCB
1.8%

Utilities

TOK
2.8%
ILCB
2.3%

Real Estate

TOK
1.7%
ILCB
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOK vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOK
TOK Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOK Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOK Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCB
ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOK vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TOKILCBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.16

2.35

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.03

3.20

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.10

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.07

14.24

-1.17

TOK vs. ILCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOK Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the ILCB Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOK and ILCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOKILCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.35

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.79

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.83

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.64

-0.20

Drawdowns

TOK vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOK drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, which is greater than ILCB's maximum drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOK and ILCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOKILCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-51.53%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.07%

-9.09%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.23%

-19.05%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

-25.47%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.82%

-35.30%

+0.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.67%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.52%

-6.24%

-2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.97%

0.00%

Volatility

TOK vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) at 2.88%. This indicates that TOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOKILCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

2.88%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

9.10%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.94%

12.02%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

17.13%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

18.16%

-1.01%

TOK vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TOK vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison

TOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than ILCB's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
0.97%1.11%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
1.25%1.37%1.66%1.95%3.55%1.66%1.52%2.12%2.74%2.60%2.56%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, TOK and ILCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TOK has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to ILCB (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOK dropped -56.18% vs ILCB's -51.53%.

On 10-year performance, ILCB leads with 15.00% vs 13.60% for TOK. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 15.00% return vs 13.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TOK.

TOK has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.97% for ILCB.

TOK tracks MSCI Kokusai Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TOK and 0.03% for ILCB.

ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOK and ILCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer