TNXT vs. SPYG
TNXT (T. Rowe Price Innovation Leaders ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TNXT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. TNXT is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TNXT charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
TNXT vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TNXT
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 5.31%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 11.48%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 1Y
- 25.88%
- 3Y*
- 26.58%
- 5Y*
- 14.08%
- 10Y*
- 17.81%
TNXT vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TNXT T. Rowe Price Innovation Leaders ETF | 12.47% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 10.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between TNXT and SPYG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TNXT vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
TNXT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPYG
TNXT vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Innovation Leaders ETF (TNXT) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TNXT | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TNXT vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNXT drawdown since its inception was -13.11%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNXT and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNXT | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.11% | -67.63% | +54.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -2.00% | +1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -24.24% | +20.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.57% | — |
Volatility
TNXT vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TNXT | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.23% | 17.37% | +3.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 21.40% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 20.72% | +0.51% |
TNXT vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNXT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TNXT vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
TNXT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
TNXT T. Rowe Price Innovation Leaders ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, TNXT and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for TNXT.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for TNXT.
TNXT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TNXT and 0.04% for SPYG.
Find the right allocation for TNXT and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer