TNC vs. CWT
TNC (Tennant Company) and CWT (California Water Service Group) are both stocks. TNC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while CWT operates in Utilities - Regulated Water (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, TNC returned 6.04%/yr vs 5.60%/yr for CWT. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TNC vs. CWT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNC achieves a 16.75% return, which is significantly higher than CWT's 5.76% return. Over the past 10 years, TNC has outperformed CWT with an annualized return of 6.04%, while CWT has yielded a comparatively lower 5.60% annualized return.
TNC
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- 16.75%
- 6M
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 16.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.04%
CWT
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 5.76%
- 6M
- 5.10%
- 1Y
- 1.75%
- 3Y*
- -4.79%
- 5Y*
- -2.52%
- 10Y*
- 5.60%
TNC vs. CWT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNC Tennant Company | 16.75% | -8.22% | -11.03% | 52.62% | -22.84% | 16.87% | -8.78% | 51.57% | -27.40% | 3.32% |
CWT California Water Service Group | 5.76% | -1.81% | -10.64% | -12.83% | -14.13% | 35.05% | 6.68% | 9.85% | 7.06% | 36.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between TNC and CWT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 1992 | 0.27 |
The correlation between TNC and CWT shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TNC:
$1.52B
CWT:
$2.70B
TNC:
$1.69
CWT:
$1.99
TNC:
50.54
CWT:
22.65
TNC:
1.29
CWT:
2.66
TNC:
2.86
CWT:
1.51
TNC:
$1.21B
CWT:
$1.01B
TNC:
$477.90M
CWT:
$366.63M
TNC:
$97.00M
CWT:
$329.51M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TNC vs. CWT — Risk / Return Rank
TNC
CWT
TNC vs. CWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tennant Company (TNC) and California Water Service Group (CWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TNC | CWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.03 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 0.12 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.54 | 0.23 | +1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TNC | CWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 0.07 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | -0.10 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.20 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.31 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
TNC vs. CWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNC drawdown since its inception was -83.81%, which is greater than CWT's maximum drawdown of -38.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNC and CWT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNC | CWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.81% | -38.21% | -45.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.71% | -14.59% | -13.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.98% | -24.13% | -24.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.98% | -38.21% | -10.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.98% | -38.21% | -10.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.29% | -30.55% | +2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.86% | -11.70% | -5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.50% | 7.70% | +2.80% |
Volatility
TNC vs. CWT - Volatility Comparison
Tennant Company (TNC) has a higher volatility of 8.33% compared to California Water Service Group (CWT) at 7.12%. This indicates that TNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TNC | CWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.33% | 7.12% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.90% | 19.03% | +13.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.29% | 24.16% | +11.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.42% | 24.29% | +5.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.16% | 27.73% | +4.43% |
Dividends
TNC vs. CWT - Dividend Comparison
TNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than CWT's 2.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWT California Water Service Group | 2.81% | 2.86% | 2.47% | 2.01% | 1.65% | 1.28% | 1.57% | 1.53% | 1.57% | 1.59% | 2.04% | 2.88% |
TNC Tennant Company | 1.44% | 1.62% | 1.39% | 1.16% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.27% | 1.13% | 1.63% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.42% |
Financials
TNC vs. CWT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tennant Company and California Water Service Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TNC vs. CWT - Profitability Comparison
TNC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tennant Company reported a gross profit of 113.60M and revenue of 297.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.1%.
CWT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, California Water Service Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 214.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TNC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tennant Company reported an operating income of 4.90M and revenue of 297.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.
CWT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, California Water Service Group reported an operating income of 18.16M and revenue of 214.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.5%.
TNC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tennant Company reported a net income of 200.00K and revenue of 297.90M, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
CWT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, California Water Service Group reported a net income of 4.04M and revenue of 214.57M, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TNC and CWT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TNC has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to CWT (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNC dropped -83.81% vs CWT's -38.21%.
TNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TNC and CWT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer