TMV vs. SOXS
TMV (Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X) and SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TMV is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (-300%), while SOXS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TMV returned -0.80%/yr vs -78.92%/yr for SOXS. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. TMV charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SOXS.
Performance
TMV vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMV achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -92.10% return. Over the past 10 years, TMV has outperformed SOXS with an annualized return of -0.80%, while SOXS has yielded a comparatively lower -78.92% annualized return.
TMV
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- 4.73%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- -4.33%
- 3Y*
- 12.83%
- 5Y*
- 19.12%
- 10Y*
- -0.80%
SOXS
- 1D
- -5.03%
- 1M
- -62.97%
- YTD
- -92.10%
- 6M
- -91.70%
- 1Y
- -97.75%
- 3Y*
- -86.64%
- 5Y*
- -79.66%
- 10Y*
- -78.92%
TMV vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMV Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X | 4.73% | -3.75% | 39.76% | -9.69% | 150.18% | 0.83% | -54.13% | -34.22% | 3.99% | -26.48% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | -92.10% | -85.53% | -59.55% | -84.56% | 15.76% | -80.94% | -92.90% | -83.81% | -19.39% | -69.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMV and SOXS is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2010 | -0.20 |
The correlation between TMV and SOXS shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (all time) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMV vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank
TMV
SOXS
TMV vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMV | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.58 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | -1.00 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | -1.44 | +1.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMV | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | -0.96 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | -0.74 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | -0.79 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.33 | -0.79 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
TMV vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMV drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMV and SOXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMV | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.96% | -100.00% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.62% | -97.68% | +76.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.49% | -99.80% | +51.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.49% | -99.97% | +51.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.31% | -100.00% | +17.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.94% | -100.00% | +4.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.60% | -92.60% | +6.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.13% | 68.64% | -57.51% |
Volatility
TMV vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV) is 8.15%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a volatility of 44.22%. This indicates that TMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMV | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 44.22% | -36.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.18% | 83.94% | -64.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.12% | 102.18% | -73.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.21% | 108.21% | -61.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.44% | 100.48% | -56.04% |
TMV vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMV has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMV vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison
TMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than SOXS's 68.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 68.34% | 10.79% | 5.45% | 9.22% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 2.30% | 0.76% |
TMV Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X | 2.62% | 2.85% | 3.41% | 3.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 1.60% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMV and SOXS have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXS has higher volatility (44.22%) compared to TMV (8.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMV dropped -98.96% vs SOXS's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, TMV leads with -0.80% vs -78.92% for SOXS. On fees, TMV is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, TMV has been the lower-risk option at 8.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TMV has performed better with a -0.80% return vs -78.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMV is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.
SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 68.34%, compared with 2.62% for TMV.
TMV is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while SOXS is Leveraged Equities. TMV tracks NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (-300%), while SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.04% for TMV and 1.08% for SOXS.
TMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMV and SOXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer