PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOXS vs. SOXQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOXS vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOXS achieves a -93.50% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 90.62% return.


SOXS

1D
22.42%
1M
-47.74%
YTD
-93.50%
6M
-93.24%
1Y
-97.76%
3Y*
-87.41%
5Y*
-80.25%
10Y*
-79.54%

SOXQ

1D
-7.82%
1M
10.55%
YTD
90.62%
6M
87.99%
1Y
158.27%
3Y*
57.61%
5Y*
34.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOXS vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares
-93.50%-85.53%-59.55%-84.56%15.76%-58.55%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
90.62%43.11%20.16%66.74%-35.59%25.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SOXS and SOXQ is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021

-0.99

The correlation between SOXS and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOXS vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOXS
SOXS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SOXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXQ
SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOXS vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOXSSOXQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.63

1.58

-0.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

10.22

-11.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.51

36.68

-38.19

SOXS vs. SOXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOXS Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the SOXQ Sharpe Ratio of 4.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOXS and SOXQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOXS vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOXS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXS and SOXQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOXSSOXQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-46.01%

-53.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.94%

-15.59%

-82.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.87%

-39.36%

-60.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.98%

-46.01%

-53.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-7.82%

-92.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.61%

-12.87%

-79.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

67.48%

4.33%

+63.15%

Volatility

SOXS vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a higher volatility of 66.67% compared to Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) at 22.04%. This indicates that SOXS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOXSSOXQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

66.67%

22.04%

+44.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

100.39%

32.49%

+67.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

117.32%

38.78%

+78.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

111.39%

37.34%

+74.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.09%

37.24%

+64.85%

SOXS vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOXS has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOXS vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison

SOXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.05%, more than SOXQ's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.27%0.50%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares
83.05%10.79%5.45%9.22%0.19%0.00%3.58%2.30%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOXS and SOXQ have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXS has higher volatility (66.67%) compared to SOXQ (22.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXS dropped -100.00% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.

On 5-year performance, SOXQ leads with 34.04% vs -80.25% for SOXS. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SOXQ has been the lower-risk option at 22.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 34.04% return vs -80.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.

SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 83.05%, compared with 0.27% for SOXQ.

SOXS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%), while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for SOXS and 0.19% for SOXQ.

SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOXS and SOXQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer