PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMV vs. AGGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMV vs. AGGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV) and Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMV achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than AGGA's 1.00% return.


TMV

1D
-1.28%
1M
-8.59%
YTD
0.33%
6M
1.80%
1Y
-3.75%
3Y*
11.80%
5Y*
21.21%
10Y*
-0.99%

AGGA

1D
0.18%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.00%
6M
1.12%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMV vs. AGGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMV and AGGA is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025

-0.81

The correlation between TMV and AGGA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.81 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMV vs. AGGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMV
TMV Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMV Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

AGGA
AGGA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AGGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMV vs. AGGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV) and Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMVAGGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.42

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

3.15

-3.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.28

12.59

-12.88

TMV vs. AGGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMV Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the AGGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMV and AGGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMV vs. AGGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMV drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, which is greater than AGGA's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMV and AGGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMVAGGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.96%

-1.47%

-97.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.62%

-1.47%

-20.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.11%

-0.12%

-95.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.60%

-0.22%

-86.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.06%

0.37%

+10.69%

Volatility

TMV vs. AGGA - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) at 0.81%. This indicates that TMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMVAGGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

0.81%

+5.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.43%

1.68%

+17.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.14%

2.15%

+25.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.07%

2.24%

+44.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.44%

2.24%

+42.20%

TMV vs. AGGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMV has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGA's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMV vs. AGGA - Dividend Comparison

TMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than AGGA's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AGGA
Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF
4.25%2.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMV
Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X
2.73%2.85%3.41%3.87%0.00%0.00%0.37%1.60%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMV and AGGA have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMV has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to AGGA (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMV dropped -98.96% vs AGGA's -1.47%.

On 1-year performance, AGGA leads with 4.48% vs -3.75% for TMV. On fees, AGGA is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, AGGA has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AGGA has performed better with a 4.48% return vs -3.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGGA is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for TMV.

AGGA has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 2.73% for TMV.

TMV is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while AGGA is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for TMV and 0.55% for AGGA.

AGGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMV and AGGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer