AGGA vs. PSQO
Compare and contrast key facts about Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) and Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF (PSQO).
AGGA and PSQO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGGA is an actively managed fund by Astoria. It was launched on Apr 30, 2025. PSQO is an actively managed fund by Palmer Square. It was launched on Sep 11, 2024.
Performance
AGGA vs. PSQO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AGGA vs. PSQO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AGGA Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF | 0.13% | 4.36% |
PSQO Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF | 0.49% | 5.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGGA achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than PSQO's 0.49% return.
AGGA
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSQO
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 5.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGGA vs. PSQO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGGA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than PSQO's 0.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AGGA vs. PSQO — Risk / Return Rank
AGGA
PSQO
AGGA vs. PSQO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) and Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF (PSQO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGGA | PSQO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.27 | 3.09 | -0.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between AGGA and PSQO is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AGGA vs. PSQO - Dividend Comparison
AGGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, less than PSQO's 4.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AGGA Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF | 3.62% | 2.81% | 0.00% |
PSQO Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF | 4.18% | 4.45% | 1.40% |
Drawdowns
AGGA vs. PSQO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGGA drawdown since its inception was -1.47%, which is greater than PSQO's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGA and PSQO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGGA | PSQO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -0.76% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -0.06% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -0.11% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.20% | — |
Volatility
AGGA vs. PSQO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AGGA | PSQO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18% | 1.56% | +0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.18% | 2.00% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.18% | 2.00% | +0.18% |