TMSIX vs. TCAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX).
TMSIX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 1993. TCAAX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 29, 2005.
Performance
TMSIX vs. TCAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMSIX vs. TCAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | 0.36% | 4.64% | 14.08% | 13.90% | -17.68% | 28.06% | 21.96% | 24.88% | -10.47% | 18.90% |
TCAAX Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund | -1.62% | 11.66% | 8.27% | 11.69% | -14.96% | 6.52% | 10.12% | 14.81% | -3.89% | 7.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMSIX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than TCAAX's -1.62% return. Over the past 10 years, TMSIX has outperformed TCAAX with an annualized return of 11.47%, while TCAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.03% annualized return.
TMSIX
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -6.41%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 9.05%
- 3Y*
- 9.10%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.47%
TCAAX
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- YTD
- -1.62%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 5.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMSIX vs. TCAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMSIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than TCAAX's 0.82% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMSIX vs. TCAAX — Risk / Return Rank
TMSIX
TCAAX
TMSIX vs. TCAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMSIX | TCAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.48 | 1.26 | -0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 1.79 | -0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.26 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 1.78 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.87 | 7.33 | -4.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMSIX | TCAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 1.26 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.46 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.71 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.57 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMSIX and TCAAX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TMSIX vs. TCAAX - Dividend Comparison
TMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.35%, more than TCAAX's 5.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | 12.35% | 12.39% | 7.91% | 1.48% | 2.86% | 10.77% | 3.26% | 2.77% | 11.64% | 7.92% | 4.10% | 11.95% |
TCAAX Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund | 5.77% | 6.19% | 3.55% | 2.52% | 1.87% | 3.74% | 3.82% | 5.15% | 3.99% | 1.77% | 1.67% | 1.51% |
Drawdowns
TMSIX vs. TCAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMSIX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, which is greater than TCAAX's maximum drawdown of -30.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSIX and TCAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMSIX | TCAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -30.82% | -25.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -5.58% | -7.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.57% | -20.33% | -11.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.66% | -20.33% | -20.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.41% | -4.17% | -2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.06% | -3.83% | -6.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 1.35% | +1.96% |
Volatility
TMSIX vs. TCAAX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX) at 2.87%. This indicates that TMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMSIX | TCAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | 2.87% | +3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.07% | 4.62% | +6.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.18% | 7.72% | +11.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 7.93% | +12.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 7.15% | +13.27% |